This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The page says that references to Evil Dead have been made in several productions, and then lists those productions. When you go to those production's pages, the references are not listed. I'm not saying they should be listed on the page of the production, but they should be listed on the Evil Dead page, or else the mention should be omitted. In any event, I think most people, when they see something like this, are going to want to know exactly what the references are. -- Corvun 06:03, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
I don't know if anyone cares, but I made an article for the old Evil Dead Commodore 64 game. There was a link to it in the Evil Dead footer box, so I figured, why not. Who made that footer box? Aguerriero 17:31, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Campbell confirmed both on his website and as an extra in the recent release of the "Evil Dead: Regeneration" video game (Multi-system) that there was interest in doing ED:IV, but Rami's schedule was what was stopping any kind of production --According to Campbell-- and that the only way they were going to do ED:IV (past tense) was if Rami decided against doing Spiderman II. While I speculate it's still possible I imagine there will be yet another sequel to Spiderman in the works and that we shouldn't be expecting it any time soon, however I don't doubt we can expect a Bruce Campbell Cameo in that movie.
--
In addition I also recently discovered a reference in Army of Darkness to an old sci-fi movie, a black & white flick by the name of "The Day the Earth Stood Still" I'll be requesting a page be done on that soon, but in the mean time I added the reference to the reference section. Correct me if you see something out of place or spelled wrong, or if you think you could word it better by all means...
P-battery 17:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC)p-bat.
Reporting on the reference to The Day The Earth Stood Still is a bit like reporting that the sky is blue. You did not discover anything. It's not a hidden easter egg, it's a flat-in-your-face joke that is repeated three times. This endless overexplaining and listing of movie jokes on wikipedia is... well, it's not wonderful. Is this what wikipedia is really for? Sorry if it seems like I'm singling you out here, it's just something I find annoying generally. 24.33.28.52 04:29, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone else think it would be a good addition to the article?-- $UIT 02:23, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
I changed the references to where the movie is set because I couldn't find any reference for it. The script itself only says that they are Michigan State students, and the movie was shot in Michigan, but neither of those definitively mean that the movie is set in Michigan. And the only reference for any Evil Dead setting being Dearborn specifically is for the video game. Lachatdelarue 11:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
In the first 2 minutes of the film, Ash is looking at a map. He states that they have just driven over the Tennessee border. I think that it is safe to say that the film is set in Tennessee. JazzButcher 06:15, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
In addition to my previous post, I have just watched the film again and at the end it says that it was shot in both Morristown, Tennessee and Detroit, Michigan. JazzButcher 06:43, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Nearly every film article I go to there is a trivia section, which frankly, are pathetic tripe. If someone has decent information add it to the flow of the article, not the easy option to set up a lame trivia section. LuciferMorgan 19:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Seconded. I don't need to be reading about JASON GOES TO HELL in this article for instance. When some punk band writes a lame song with an Ash sample, it's not a trivia question about THE EVIL DEAD. That kind of stuff is intrusive. And for gods sake stop explaining jokes. The reason people laughed is that they got the joke already. Explaining it ruins the fun. 24.33.28.52 04:32, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Also, IMHO, the list of translated titles used in other countries are not exactly useful: they'll always be incomplete and don't really add anything about the film. -- Outlyer 17:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
I for one LOVE reading the trivia section to film articles. I felt this article was a little lame because it did not have one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.198.138.234 ( talk) 20:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't recall it ever being specifically stated in the film where the cabin was.
-- Name Theft Victim 00:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
At the beginning of the movie, the Ash character remarks from the back seat of their moving car that they had just passed the Tennessee state line. The end credits of the film (which I just finished watching minutes ago) explictly state it was filmed in both Morristown, Tennessee and Detroit, Michigan. KevinOKeeffe ( talk) 10:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
The plots written terribly, as if it had been translated or something. Could we rewrite it?-- 81.132.41.51 ( talk) 18:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Somebody needs to fix the plot so its readable. Its fine for the main part, but at times is incomprehensible (I do it myself, but I haven't actually seen the film) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.214.74 ( talk) 01:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
The grammar in the plot description is still terrible.
How did the last evil survive? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.1.19.148 ( talk) 22:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
The article states this film was released on October 15th of 1981, but the film credits clearly list it as copyright 1982. Is this a discrepancy, or do films sometimes not get copyrighted until after their release? KevinOKeeffe ( talk) 10:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
It may have had a Copyright pending ... -Ed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.222.232.204 ( talk) 21:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
I object to "(also known as: Evil Dead, The Book of the Dead, Sam Raimi's The Evil Dead and The Evil Dead, the Ultimate Experience in Grueling Horror)", especially early in the article. The movie has a title; who cares whether indeterminate numbers of anonymous people "know" it otherwise? Unfree ( talk) 04:52, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
When I saw this movie I thought it was a satire of a horror movie, but the article seems to suggest that it is a serious horror movie. Is it intended to be humorous, or do I just have a twisted sense of humour to have responded to it that way? -- 194.98.58.121 ( talk) 09:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Both —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.49.126 ( talk) 07:14, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Conflicting texts:
vs.
Moving them here until a source is cited on the issue of another sequel vel non.
There was a radio interview that Campbell said emphatically, "no" He's just too old. In the same interview, he said the work on Burn Notice is enough exercise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.49.126 ( talk) 07:16, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
is the budget true? it was 375000 and sold 24 million? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goostaw ( talk • contribs) 06:22, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Where did all the links to the different demons come from? Is it actually stated that the Demons are what they're linked to be?
Some pictures there should be replaced, mainly the one of the contact lens. Simply because that particular contact lens is not the one used in the movie, it's just a picture of a lens. The links for words ( contact lens) is enough for people to know what it is, but we should use the actual lens shown in the movie instead. That's my opinion to achieve full clarity, some may assume that particular lens is in fact one that was used. What do you think? Sivos909 ( talk) 01:01, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Did something happen to the top of the article? Where's the poster and the table of actors and directors and stuff? -- Matt723star ( talk) 15:27, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cirt ( talk · contribs) 02:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
I will review this article. — Cirt ( talk) 02:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of May 4, 2013, compares against the six good article criteria:
NOTE: Please respond, below, and please don't intersperse comments in between mine in this review, instead please comment below, after this review, below it. Thank you!
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. — Cirt ( talk) 20:23, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Sorry if it took a while to reply. igordebraga ≠ 05:29, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
OK. Fixed the lead stuff from A, reworked Cast/Development into Production (as well as adding actor names to the plot), changed the Cracked ref, expanded the poster rationale, changed the biased example above. Also put it on the GOCE, don't know if someone will help soon enough. But I didn't put that regarding the aggregators because most of the reviews used there are retroactive - after all, both RT and MC mostly use online texts. igordebraga ≠ 15:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
And Done with copyediting! Sorry about all that indenting. :) I think this is a interesting and well-researched article (and I'm not a fan of the film for the record.). :) Rapunzel-bellflower ( talk) 23:33, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks very much to those above that helped out with copyediting, — Cirt ( talk) 05:45, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Citation needed for last sentence in sect, Legacy. — Cirt ( talk) 13:34, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
La Casa series, unsourced sect. This entire section of the article is unsourced. Added {{ unsourcedsect}} until this glaring problem is addressed. — Cirt ( talk) 13:35, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Substed template to top of article page, using {{ Unsourced additions}} template. — Cirt ( talk) 16:04, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Adding some citation needed tags in this sect. Lots of unsourced issues still remain with this wholly problematic sect. — Cirt ( talk) 16:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
— Cirt ( talk) 12:06, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
And yet you also cut out my fixing of two additions put by Cirt, one unintentional (the gap atop the article caused by {{unsourced additions}}), and one for improvement (requesting a cite regarding Bruce's cameo in the remake). Not the best thing you could do. igordebraga ≠ 15:11, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I apologise for any trouble I may have indadvertedly caused - I certainly did not intend to remove a Citation request - If I have any edits I want to make in future, I'll air them here on the talk page first. Etron81 ( talk) 18:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I like that scene where that hot chick gets raped by a tree. She has nice breasts, and it was cool when that long and thick branch or root rammed itself into her vagina. Could someone upload a pic of that? A GIF image would be nice.
The image should not be included, due to the simple fact that such a powerfully disturbing scene should not be "spoiled" by such a visual preview (in addition to other reasons already stated). KevinOKeeffe ( talk) 10:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Imagine if somebody were to say, "I like that bit of history when the Nazis exterminated the Jews." I'm amazed that the misogynist imbecile who posted the original comment didn't have his comment removed quick smart. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.12.110.229 ( talk) 12:02, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
I'm not entirely clear why @ Unreal7: changed the hatnote from The Evil Dead (disambiguation) to Evil Dead (franchise) in this pair of edits.
The disambiguation page gives a concise list of alternate uses to help people find exactly what they're looking for, whereas the franchise article- while fine if you *want* an overview of the franchise at a whole- forces people to read through the whole thing to find the specific part of the franchise they're looking for.
I've restored the original version. If this is disagreed with, please let me know why, thanks.
Ubcule ( talk) 21:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on The Evil Dead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Evil Dead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.timeout.com/film/reviews/64080/the_evil_dead.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
In the plot section, the following sentences are present: "When [Ash] reaches for [Linda's] necklace on the ground, she escapes again trying to kill him. Ash decapitates her with a shovel, and her headless body bleeds all over Ash's face as it tries to rape him before he escapes." Having watched the movie and thus that scene, I can certainly affirm that there's plenty of blood poured on Ash's face, but I don't think that there's any clear onscreen indication (unlike the infamous tree sequence several scenes prior) that the headless body was attempting to rape Ash. I also can't seem to find any online sources to confirm that this scene involved an attempted rape. Would anyone else like to weigh on this before I (or another user) edits the plot section to amend this apparent inaccuracy? – Matthew - ( talk) 18:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
writing
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The page says that references to Evil Dead have been made in several productions, and then lists those productions. When you go to those production's pages, the references are not listed. I'm not saying they should be listed on the page of the production, but they should be listed on the Evil Dead page, or else the mention should be omitted. In any event, I think most people, when they see something like this, are going to want to know exactly what the references are. -- Corvun 06:03, 24 Aug 2004 (UTC)
I don't know if anyone cares, but I made an article for the old Evil Dead Commodore 64 game. There was a link to it in the Evil Dead footer box, so I figured, why not. Who made that footer box? Aguerriero 17:31, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Campbell confirmed both on his website and as an extra in the recent release of the "Evil Dead: Regeneration" video game (Multi-system) that there was interest in doing ED:IV, but Rami's schedule was what was stopping any kind of production --According to Campbell-- and that the only way they were going to do ED:IV (past tense) was if Rami decided against doing Spiderman II. While I speculate it's still possible I imagine there will be yet another sequel to Spiderman in the works and that we shouldn't be expecting it any time soon, however I don't doubt we can expect a Bruce Campbell Cameo in that movie.
--
In addition I also recently discovered a reference in Army of Darkness to an old sci-fi movie, a black & white flick by the name of "The Day the Earth Stood Still" I'll be requesting a page be done on that soon, but in the mean time I added the reference to the reference section. Correct me if you see something out of place or spelled wrong, or if you think you could word it better by all means...
P-battery 17:59, 27 February 2006 (UTC)p-bat.
Reporting on the reference to The Day The Earth Stood Still is a bit like reporting that the sky is blue. You did not discover anything. It's not a hidden easter egg, it's a flat-in-your-face joke that is repeated three times. This endless overexplaining and listing of movie jokes on wikipedia is... well, it's not wonderful. Is this what wikipedia is really for? Sorry if it seems like I'm singling you out here, it's just something I find annoying generally. 24.33.28.52 04:29, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Does anyone else think it would be a good addition to the article?-- $UIT 02:23, 15 September 2007 (UTC)
I changed the references to where the movie is set because I couldn't find any reference for it. The script itself only says that they are Michigan State students, and the movie was shot in Michigan, but neither of those definitively mean that the movie is set in Michigan. And the only reference for any Evil Dead setting being Dearborn specifically is for the video game. Lachatdelarue 11:45, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
In the first 2 minutes of the film, Ash is looking at a map. He states that they have just driven over the Tennessee border. I think that it is safe to say that the film is set in Tennessee. JazzButcher 06:15, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
In addition to my previous post, I have just watched the film again and at the end it says that it was shot in both Morristown, Tennessee and Detroit, Michigan. JazzButcher 06:43, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
Nearly every film article I go to there is a trivia section, which frankly, are pathetic tripe. If someone has decent information add it to the flow of the article, not the easy option to set up a lame trivia section. LuciferMorgan 19:33, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Seconded. I don't need to be reading about JASON GOES TO HELL in this article for instance. When some punk band writes a lame song with an Ash sample, it's not a trivia question about THE EVIL DEAD. That kind of stuff is intrusive. And for gods sake stop explaining jokes. The reason people laughed is that they got the joke already. Explaining it ruins the fun. 24.33.28.52 04:32, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
Also, IMHO, the list of translated titles used in other countries are not exactly useful: they'll always be incomplete and don't really add anything about the film. -- Outlyer 17:05, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
I for one LOVE reading the trivia section to film articles. I felt this article was a little lame because it did not have one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.198.138.234 ( talk) 20:36, 5 November 2007 (UTC)
I don't recall it ever being specifically stated in the film where the cabin was.
-- Name Theft Victim 00:55, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
At the beginning of the movie, the Ash character remarks from the back seat of their moving car that they had just passed the Tennessee state line. The end credits of the film (which I just finished watching minutes ago) explictly state it was filmed in both Morristown, Tennessee and Detroit, Michigan. KevinOKeeffe ( talk) 10:30, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
The plots written terribly, as if it had been translated or something. Could we rewrite it?-- 81.132.41.51 ( talk) 18:46, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Somebody needs to fix the plot so its readable. Its fine for the main part, but at times is incomprehensible (I do it myself, but I haven't actually seen the film) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.241.214.74 ( talk) 01:44, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
The grammar in the plot description is still terrible.
How did the last evil survive? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.1.19.148 ( talk) 22:28, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
The article states this film was released on October 15th of 1981, but the film credits clearly list it as copyright 1982. Is this a discrepancy, or do films sometimes not get copyrighted until after their release? KevinOKeeffe ( talk) 10:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
It may have had a Copyright pending ... -Ed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.222.232.204 ( talk) 21:55, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
I object to "(also known as: Evil Dead, The Book of the Dead, Sam Raimi's The Evil Dead and The Evil Dead, the Ultimate Experience in Grueling Horror)", especially early in the article. The movie has a title; who cares whether indeterminate numbers of anonymous people "know" it otherwise? Unfree ( talk) 04:52, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
When I saw this movie I thought it was a satire of a horror movie, but the article seems to suggest that it is a serious horror movie. Is it intended to be humorous, or do I just have a twisted sense of humour to have responded to it that way? -- 194.98.58.121 ( talk) 09:26, 22 July 2009 (UTC)
Both —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.49.126 ( talk) 07:14, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
Conflicting texts:
vs.
Moving them here until a source is cited on the issue of another sequel vel non.
There was a radio interview that Campbell said emphatically, "no" He's just too old. In the same interview, he said the work on Burn Notice is enough exercise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.113.49.126 ( talk) 07:16, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
is the budget true? it was 375000 and sold 24 million? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goostaw ( talk • contribs) 06:22, 1 November 2009 (UTC)
Where did all the links to the different demons come from? Is it actually stated that the Demons are what they're linked to be?
Some pictures there should be replaced, mainly the one of the contact lens. Simply because that particular contact lens is not the one used in the movie, it's just a picture of a lens. The links for words ( contact lens) is enough for people to know what it is, but we should use the actual lens shown in the movie instead. That's my opinion to achieve full clarity, some may assume that particular lens is in fact one that was used. What do you think? Sivos909 ( talk) 01:01, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Did something happen to the top of the article? Where's the poster and the table of actors and directors and stuff? -- Matt723star ( talk) 15:27, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Cirt ( talk · contribs) 02:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
I will review this article. — Cirt ( talk) 02:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)
This article's Good Article promotion has been put on hold. During review, some issues were discovered that can be resolved without a major re-write. This is how the article, as of May 4, 2013, compares against the six good article criteria:
NOTE: Please respond, below, and please don't intersperse comments in between mine in this review, instead please comment below, after this review, below it. Thank you!
Please address these matters soon and then leave a note here showing how they have been resolved. After 48 hours the article should be reviewed again. If these issues are not addressed within 7 days, the article may be failed without further notice. Thank you for your work so far. — Cirt ( talk) 20:23, 4 May 2013 (UTC)
Sorry if it took a while to reply. igordebraga ≠ 05:29, 7 May 2013 (UTC)
OK. Fixed the lead stuff from A, reworked Cast/Development into Production (as well as adding actor names to the plot), changed the Cracked ref, expanded the poster rationale, changed the biased example above. Also put it on the GOCE, don't know if someone will help soon enough. But I didn't put that regarding the aggregators because most of the reviews used there are retroactive - after all, both RT and MC mostly use online texts. igordebraga ≠ 15:38, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
And Done with copyediting! Sorry about all that indenting. :) I think this is a interesting and well-researched article (and I'm not a fan of the film for the record.). :) Rapunzel-bellflower ( talk) 23:33, 17 May 2013 (UTC)
Thanks very much to those above that helped out with copyediting, — Cirt ( talk) 05:45, 18 May 2013 (UTC)
Citation needed for last sentence in sect, Legacy. — Cirt ( talk) 13:34, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
La Casa series, unsourced sect. This entire section of the article is unsourced. Added {{ unsourcedsect}} until this glaring problem is addressed. — Cirt ( talk) 13:35, 26 April 2013 (UTC)
Substed template to top of article page, using {{ Unsourced additions}} template. — Cirt ( talk) 16:04, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Adding some citation needed tags in this sect. Lots of unsourced issues still remain with this wholly problematic sect. — Cirt ( talk) 16:06, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
— Cirt ( talk) 12:06, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
And yet you also cut out my fixing of two additions put by Cirt, one unintentional (the gap atop the article caused by {{unsourced additions}}), and one for improvement (requesting a cite regarding Bruce's cameo in the remake). Not the best thing you could do. igordebraga ≠ 15:11, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I apologise for any trouble I may have indadvertedly caused - I certainly did not intend to remove a Citation request - If I have any edits I want to make in future, I'll air them here on the talk page first. Etron81 ( talk) 18:16, 29 April 2013 (UTC)
I like that scene where that hot chick gets raped by a tree. She has nice breasts, and it was cool when that long and thick branch or root rammed itself into her vagina. Could someone upload a pic of that? A GIF image would be nice.
The image should not be included, due to the simple fact that such a powerfully disturbing scene should not be "spoiled" by such a visual preview (in addition to other reasons already stated). KevinOKeeffe ( talk) 10:34, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
Imagine if somebody were to say, "I like that bit of history when the Nazis exterminated the Jews." I'm amazed that the misogynist imbecile who posted the original comment didn't have his comment removed quick smart. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 180.12.110.229 ( talk) 12:02, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
I'm not entirely clear why @ Unreal7: changed the hatnote from The Evil Dead (disambiguation) to Evil Dead (franchise) in this pair of edits.
The disambiguation page gives a concise list of alternate uses to help people find exactly what they're looking for, whereas the franchise article- while fine if you *want* an overview of the franchise at a whole- forces people to read through the whole thing to find the specific part of the franchise they're looking for.
I've restored the original version. If this is disagreed with, please let me know why, thanks.
Ubcule ( talk) 21:40, 15 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on The Evil Dead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:56, 30 April 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Evil Dead. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.timeout.com/film/reviews/64080/the_evil_dead.htmlWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 13:47, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
In the plot section, the following sentences are present: "When [Ash] reaches for [Linda's] necklace on the ground, she escapes again trying to kill him. Ash decapitates her with a shovel, and her headless body bleeds all over Ash's face as it tries to rape him before he escapes." Having watched the movie and thus that scene, I can certainly affirm that there's plenty of blood poured on Ash's face, but I don't think that there's any clear onscreen indication (unlike the infamous tree sequence several scenes prior) that the headless body was attempting to rape Ash. I also can't seem to find any online sources to confirm that this scene involved an attempted rape. Would anyone else like to weigh on this before I (or another user) edits the plot section to amend this apparent inaccuracy? – Matthew - ( talk) 18:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
writing
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).