![]() | The Erlenmeyer Flask has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | The Erlenmeyer Flask is part of the Mythology of The X-Files, Volume 1 series, a good topic. It is also part of the The X-Files (season 1) series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't we actually have a picture of the Erlenmeyer flask itself ? -- Beardo 03:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
I think we should clean up this article, as the trivia section is very poorly done, and is not written in the style of a trivia note. All the questions should be re-stated as a sub-section of statements about the questions the episode raises. Also, the caption under the screenshot of the fetus should be changed. Of course, the plot also needs expansion, but I thought this was more urgent. Simpson, Bart 23:02, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Simpson, Bart
The ending scene here which "mirrors a scene in the pilot" also "mirrors" the end to "Raiders of the Lost Ark" - either intentionally or unintentionally. I'm not an X-files expert but someone who is should consider adding this to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.248.15.158 ( talk) 01:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Wow- that was fast. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.248.15.158 ( talk) 01:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
It seems to me that he would have said "fascinating" from the context of the Filming and Effects section. If he did say the shot was "fascinated," is that an error on his part or is there some jargony way that a shot can be fascinated?
Thanks, -- Geekdiva ( talk) 23:47, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
![]() | The Erlenmeyer Flask has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
![]() | The Erlenmeyer Flask is part of the Mythology of The X-Files, Volume 1 series, a good topic. It is also part of the The X-Files (season 1) series, a good topic. These are identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve them, please do so. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Shouldn't we actually have a picture of the Erlenmeyer flask itself ? -- Beardo 03:23, 17 May 2007 (UTC)
I think we should clean up this article, as the trivia section is very poorly done, and is not written in the style of a trivia note. All the questions should be re-stated as a sub-section of statements about the questions the episode raises. Also, the caption under the screenshot of the fetus should be changed. Of course, the plot also needs expansion, but I thought this was more urgent. Simpson, Bart 23:02, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Simpson, Bart
The ending scene here which "mirrors a scene in the pilot" also "mirrors" the end to "Raiders of the Lost Ark" - either intentionally or unintentionally. I'm not an X-files expert but someone who is should consider adding this to the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.248.15.158 ( talk) 01:36, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Wow- that was fast. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 166.248.15.158 ( talk) 01:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
It seems to me that he would have said "fascinating" from the context of the Filming and Effects section. If he did say the shot was "fascinated," is that an error on his part or is there some jargony way that a shot can be fascinated?
Thanks, -- Geekdiva ( talk) 23:47, 23 June 2011 (UTC)