GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 20:44, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
I'll take up this review. Initially this looks like a well referenced and well written article, so hopefully there shouldn't be a lot of point to make! I will read through this article and give my first initial comments tomorrow. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 20:44, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This appears to be a well written and much applauded article - it gained 3214 views last month [1] and the subject itself is very famous. I will mainly focus on copyediting issues.
This is a well written and referenced article, when I first looked through it I thought that it could pass with ease and I was not wrong. The problems with this article (if you can count them as 'problems') are a couple of dead links and some very minor copyediting issues. The lead looked fine and complied per WP:LEAD. Overall it is a modest article that attracted some 3214 people a month but I must congratulate all the work that has been put into it! I will put this article on hold for a maximum of seven days. Once these very minor issues have been addressed I be happy to grant this GA status! ☠ Jag uar ☠ 23:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the review, all points addressed except the currency converter.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:51, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Since all those minor (mostly copyediting) issues have been addressed, I will be happy to give The Dorchester its well deserved GA status. The whole article complied per the GA criteria. Don't worry about the currency converter, I looked myself and couldn't find anything that would convert Pounds into US Dollars... but other than that, well done on building another Good Article! From the start I knew that this one would easily pass. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 13:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the review.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:40, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 20:44, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
I'll take up this review. Initially this looks like a well referenced and well written article, so hopefully there shouldn't be a lot of point to make! I will read through this article and give my first initial comments tomorrow. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 20:44, 21 December 2013 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
This appears to be a well written and much applauded article - it gained 3214 views last month [1] and the subject itself is very famous. I will mainly focus on copyediting issues.
This is a well written and referenced article, when I first looked through it I thought that it could pass with ease and I was not wrong. The problems with this article (if you can count them as 'problems') are a couple of dead links and some very minor copyediting issues. The lead looked fine and complied per WP:LEAD. Overall it is a modest article that attracted some 3214 people a month but I must congratulate all the work that has been put into it! I will put this article on hold for a maximum of seven days. Once these very minor issues have been addressed I be happy to grant this GA status! ☠ Jag uar ☠ 23:53, 22 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the review, all points addressed except the currency converter.♦ Dr. Blofeld 10:51, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Since all those minor (mostly copyediting) issues have been addressed, I will be happy to give The Dorchester its well deserved GA status. The whole article complied per the GA criteria. Don't worry about the currency converter, I looked myself and couldn't find anything that would convert Pounds into US Dollars... but other than that, well done on building another Good Article! From the start I knew that this one would easily pass. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 13:49, 23 December 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the review.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:40, 23 December 2013 (UTC)