Is the deletion of the {{ notability}} tag without any comment to be understood that no reliable sources explaining notability will be forthcoming? Weregerbil 14:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Allright! That's what I'm talking about! Now for an article that is sourced from those reliable sources in a neutral way (as opposed to what the self-published sources say). As of now the article makes fairly few statements; the "largest meeting" and the attendee list are pretty much the only ones that could be sourced. Although "largest meeting" may need to qualified with e.g. "...until then", because the sources from 2001 can't of course verify that there hasn't been a larger meeting after that. Weregerbil 15:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Is the deletion of the {{ notability}} tag without any comment to be understood that no reliable sources explaining notability will be forthcoming? Weregerbil 14:44, 10 August 2006 (UTC)
Allright! That's what I'm talking about! Now for an article that is sourced from those reliable sources in a neutral way (as opposed to what the self-published sources say). As of now the article makes fairly few statements; the "largest meeting" and the attendee list are pretty much the only ones that could be sourced. Although "largest meeting" may need to qualified with e.g. "...until then", because the sources from 2001 can't of course verify that there hasn't been a larger meeting after that. Weregerbil 15:38, 10 August 2006 (UTC)