This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the
current tasks, visit the
notice board,
the attached article or discuss it at the
project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns articles
We don't have a single picture of the Daltons? Come on. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
129.64.221.238 (
talk) 21:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)reply
The Lucky Luke canon is a valid source for references
The Lucky Luke canon is a valid source for references, which this article is tagged as clearly needing. Valid sources about Morris and Goscinny could be utilized to reference the origin of the Dalton cousins, but the canon itself is a valuable source that cannot be dismissed out of hand. To do so is tantamount to page vandalism.
TH1980 (
talk) 03:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)reply
First of all, random accusations of vandalism are not a good way to start a discussion. Secondly, you misunderstand what the tag means: it asks for more sources - that is not fixed by retelling several anecdotes from one of the books in the series.
Mezigue (
talk) 17:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)reply
I apologize for the "vandalism" comment, but my intention is to source this page starting with pertinent references to books in the canon, using select anecdotes to amplify what is already presented.
TH1980 (
talk) 04:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)reply
"To each on their own"?
A Lucky Luke story cointaining The Daltons named "To each on their own" is mentioned severeal times in the article. However, I couldn't find anything about such a story. Does it even exist? Is the name cited correctly? --
JakobvS (
talk) 17:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The actual title appears to be Cavalier Seul. No idea where this English title comes from. I have removed this obsessive retelling of this particular book twice but, well see discussion just above.
Mezigue (
talk) 15:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belgium, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Belgium on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelgiumWikipedia:WikiProject BelgiumTemplate:WikiProject BelgiumBelgium-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the
current tasks, visit the
notice board,
the attached article or discuss it at the
project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns articles
We don't have a single picture of the Daltons? Come on. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
129.64.221.238 (
talk) 21:02, 27 March 2012 (UTC)reply
The Lucky Luke canon is a valid source for references
The Lucky Luke canon is a valid source for references, which this article is tagged as clearly needing. Valid sources about Morris and Goscinny could be utilized to reference the origin of the Dalton cousins, but the canon itself is a valuable source that cannot be dismissed out of hand. To do so is tantamount to page vandalism.
TH1980 (
talk) 03:29, 7 January 2016 (UTC)reply
First of all, random accusations of vandalism are not a good way to start a discussion. Secondly, you misunderstand what the tag means: it asks for more sources - that is not fixed by retelling several anecdotes from one of the books in the series.
Mezigue (
talk) 17:37, 7 January 2016 (UTC)reply
I apologize for the "vandalism" comment, but my intention is to source this page starting with pertinent references to books in the canon, using select anecdotes to amplify what is already presented.
TH1980 (
talk) 04:50, 8 January 2016 (UTC)reply
"To each on their own"?
A Lucky Luke story cointaining The Daltons named "To each on their own" is mentioned severeal times in the article. However, I couldn't find anything about such a story. Does it even exist? Is the name cited correctly? --
JakobvS (
talk) 17:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)reply
The actual title appears to be Cavalier Seul. No idea where this English title comes from. I have removed this obsessive retelling of this particular book twice but, well see discussion just above.
Mezigue (
talk) 15:11, 14 March 2016 (UTC)reply