Update: A bit busy now, I think I will be able to get to this only by the end of this week. Cheers!
Sainsf<^>Feel at home 18:47, 27 March 2016 (UTC)reply
That's fine, no rush. Thanks!
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 19:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Ɱ: Managed to add all my comments, returning only for reviews! This article is so well-written, I have only a few comments:
Sainsf<^>Feel at home 07:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
In History:
sixteen students "sixteen" would look better in digits as per the MOS.
I like to keep history sections with more prose and less numbers if I can; and
MOS:NUMERAL is okay with either.
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
purchased the northern portion of the property When?
This sentence is just more information about the same purchase, in 2015.
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
In Campus media:mise en place Does it not begin with caps?
That's correct, it's stylized in that fashion.
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
In The CIA Singapore: Temasek Polytechnic is a duplink
It's often seen as okay in certain circumstances. Here I link it in the history section, however many people just reading about the campuses (or not reading history/any large paragraphs) will surely miss that earlier link and presume there's no page on Temasek, if it lacks a link in that campus section, pretty far down the page too I might add.
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
No problem. Duplinks are good in some cases...
Sainsf<^>Feel at home 16:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Parts of Campus media, Campuses, Brandig and Augie award need citations. Even if they do not need sources.
Looking into this...
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
I added some sources already, but I have more to go...
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 17:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Ɱ: I think you are busy elsewhere, when can we finish working on the last point?
Sainsf<^>Feel at home 13:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)reply
I'm sorry. I did a bit more recently; I will get to it again tomorrow.
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 01:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)reply
No hurry, just let me know when you are done. The review is open till we keep working. :)
Sainsf<^>Feel at home 04:11, 7 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Okay, I added a lot more references, what do you think now?
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 17:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Much better! Only three parts look unsourced:
The CIA Singapore section
In popular media section
Not all points on the alumni look sourced.
These fixed, I would be glad to promote this.
Sainsf<^>Feel at home 17:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Okay, it should be fixed now. By the way, I'm curious if you'll be willing to review my FAC
Briarcliff Manor Public Library, perhaps in turn for me reviewing your FAC
Springbok? I likely need more eyes on the library article in order for it to pass.
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 23:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Great, I am happy to promote this article. Thanks for your kind offer, I am willing to review any nomination I have some idea about. Will take some time out for it. Try springbok of you get time, no quid pro quo necessary. Cheers,
Sainsf<^>Feel at home 03:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Update: A bit busy now, I think I will be able to get to this only by the end of this week. Cheers!
Sainsf<^>Feel at home 18:47, 27 March 2016 (UTC)reply
That's fine, no rush. Thanks!
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 19:08, 27 March 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Ɱ: Managed to add all my comments, returning only for reviews! This article is so well-written, I have only a few comments:
Sainsf<^>Feel at home 07:23, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
In History:
sixteen students "sixteen" would look better in digits as per the MOS.
I like to keep history sections with more prose and less numbers if I can; and
MOS:NUMERAL is okay with either.
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
purchased the northern portion of the property When?
This sentence is just more information about the same purchase, in 2015.
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
In Campus media:mise en place Does it not begin with caps?
That's correct, it's stylized in that fashion.
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
In The CIA Singapore: Temasek Polytechnic is a duplink
It's often seen as okay in certain circumstances. Here I link it in the history section, however many people just reading about the campuses (or not reading history/any large paragraphs) will surely miss that earlier link and presume there's no page on Temasek, if it lacks a link in that campus section, pretty far down the page too I might add.
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
No problem. Duplinks are good in some cases...
Sainsf<^>Feel at home 16:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Parts of Campus media, Campuses, Brandig and Augie award need citations. Even if they do not need sources.
Looking into this...
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 16:41, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
I added some sources already, but I have more to go...
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 17:20, 28 March 2016 (UTC)reply
@
Ɱ: I think you are busy elsewhere, when can we finish working on the last point?
Sainsf<^>Feel at home 13:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)reply
I'm sorry. I did a bit more recently; I will get to it again tomorrow.
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 01:18, 7 April 2016 (UTC)reply
No hurry, just let me know when you are done. The review is open till we keep working. :)
Sainsf<^>Feel at home 04:11, 7 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Okay, I added a lot more references, what do you think now?
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 17:23, 11 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Much better! Only three parts look unsourced:
The CIA Singapore section
In popular media section
Not all points on the alumni look sourced.
These fixed, I would be glad to promote this.
Sainsf<^>Feel at home 17:58, 11 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Okay, it should be fixed now. By the way, I'm curious if you'll be willing to review my FAC
Briarcliff Manor Public Library, perhaps in turn for me reviewing your FAC
Springbok? I likely need more eyes on the library article in order for it to pass.
ɱ(talk ·
vbm ·
coi) 23:45, 17 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Great, I am happy to promote this article. Thanks for your kind offer, I am willing to review any nomination I have some idea about. Will take some time out for it. Try springbok of you get time, no quid pro quo necessary. Cheers,
Sainsf<^>Feel at home 03:43, 18 April 2016 (UTC)reply