![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The plot summary sounds like it's straight from a network press release; poorly written with a lot of adjectives. If no one can provide a better summary, I think we should delete it. Discuss?
Yes, it certainly looks like it was copied directly (with ONE minor change) from here: [1]. I like the way it reads, but, I doubt there is any room for argument, it is a clear copyright violation. See [2]. I have no idea how to list this under copyright violation as suggested in the referenced article-anyone? Or would someone want to undertake a rewrite? JeanColumbia 19:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
I edited the plot line to alleviate copyright concerns. 66.28.217.228 20:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't understand why Simon Callow is mentioned as an uncredited cameo. His name appears in the credits at the beginning of the show, and the MSNBC review referenced calls him a cameo, but doesn't state he's uncredited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.68.213.246 ( talk) 21:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Image:The Company Poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 06:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
What could possibly be the relevance of footnote #1? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.69.128.233 ( talk) 03:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
The plot summary sounds like it's straight from a network press release; poorly written with a lot of adjectives. If no one can provide a better summary, I think we should delete it. Discuss?
Yes, it certainly looks like it was copied directly (with ONE minor change) from here: [1]. I like the way it reads, but, I doubt there is any room for argument, it is a clear copyright violation. See [2]. I have no idea how to list this under copyright violation as suggested in the referenced article-anyone? Or would someone want to undertake a rewrite? JeanColumbia 19:56, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
I edited the plot line to alleviate copyright concerns. 66.28.217.228 20:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
I don't understand why Simon Callow is mentioned as an uncredited cameo. His name appears in the credits at the beginning of the show, and the MSNBC review referenced calls him a cameo, but doesn't state he's uncredited. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.68.213.246 ( talk) 21:08, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Image:The Company Poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. BetacommandBot ( talk) 06:27, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
What could possibly be the relevance of footnote #1? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.69.128.233 ( talk) 03:45, 10 January 2010 (UTC)