![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
@ CorporateM:, did you not notice that the source immediately after the one you've reverted out for a second time is a news report in the Irish Examiner on that exact judgement? Could you please explain why that is not a secondary source that establishes notability? Dolescum ( talk) 06:41, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I appreciate your review of the entry. The latest version clearly does not reflect a balanced view of the organisation, which I clearly state that I represent.
In particular, there are 3 gross factual inaccuracies that I would like addressed immediately:
Many thanks Callcott1 ( talk) 15:54, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
@ CorporateM:, did you not notice that the source immediately after the one you've reverted out for a second time is a news report in the Irish Examiner on that exact judgement? Could you please explain why that is not a secondary source that establishes notability? Dolescum ( talk) 06:41, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
I appreciate your review of the entry. The latest version clearly does not reflect a balanced view of the organisation, which I clearly state that I represent.
In particular, there are 3 gross factual inaccuracies that I would like addressed immediately:
Many thanks Callcott1 ( talk) 15:54, 7 November 2014 (UTC)