This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Tidied up somewhat as the separate sections are all on the same subject, whether the source data is NPOV or a copy violation. It is to be noted that the objectors here do not respect the basic requirement of an editor, to know their subject. I know Graham Wells personally and was last asked to perform by Lucie Skeaping six months ago, on live national radio.
Looks like a copy vio - appears to be the blurb from a CD sleeve.
I have added the bands earliest recordings to the discography and ammended the period that band started to the early 70's as the first album was released in 1974, therefore the bands inception must pre-date that.
Aren't they WAITS (without an "e")? IXIA 07:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
To describe Lucie Skeaping as "For an academic... stunningly glamorous" is rather a back-handed compliment to Lucie Skeaping and an implied slur on all the male and female glamour on show in academe. Nor am I sure it's right to refer to her as an "academic". She's certainly a music scholar, and seemingly a good one but she doesn't work in academia which I think is the only sensible definition of an "academic". Since this sentence tells us nothing except that she's very fanciable - which is not relevant within the context of the article - I suggest you remove it. Your link to the City Waites website will enable people to view the lovely Lucie for themselves. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.29.104 ( talk) 11:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Tidied up somewhat as the separate sections are all on the same subject, whether the source data is NPOV or a copy violation. It is to be noted that the objectors here do not respect the basic requirement of an editor, to know their subject. I know Graham Wells personally and was last asked to perform by Lucie Skeaping six months ago, on live national radio.
Looks like a copy vio - appears to be the blurb from a CD sleeve.
I have added the bands earliest recordings to the discography and ammended the period that band started to the early 70's as the first album was released in 1974, therefore the bands inception must pre-date that.
Aren't they WAITS (without an "e")? IXIA 07:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
To describe Lucie Skeaping as "For an academic... stunningly glamorous" is rather a back-handed compliment to Lucie Skeaping and an implied slur on all the male and female glamour on show in academe. Nor am I sure it's right to refer to her as an "academic". She's certainly a music scholar, and seemingly a good one but she doesn't work in academia which I think is the only sensible definition of an "academic". Since this sentence tells us nothing except that she's very fanciable - which is not relevant within the context of the article - I suggest you remove it. Your link to the City Waites website will enable people to view the lovely Lucie for themselves. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.67.29.104 ( talk) 11:00, 24 October 2007 (UTC)