![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Woot for self-promotion.
---
Remind me when I get around to it to change all the "only newspaper at U.Va." mentions in the article to "only daily newspaper at U.Va."
The newspaper infobox is totally non-compliant Wikipedia code -- it's written in HTML, rather than standard Wiki markup. I took the time to mark it up properly, which somebody undid two days later, with the comment "People read the article, not the coding. That old box seems to look a lot better than the June 10th revision." If somebody has a problem with the look of Wikipedia, perhaps it would be best to take that up through proper channels, rather than hacking together an HTML-based workaround.
Unless somebody provides a decent reason for why the Cav Daily's entry should not adhere to Wikipedia standards, I'm going to fix the infobox again. -- WaldoJ 02:17, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Anyone know why the CD website is offline? Tjarrett ( talk) 16:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Anyone know how to pull old articles from the Cav that don't show up online? Kjs2x ( talk) 16:49, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Woot for self-promotion.
---
Remind me when I get around to it to change all the "only newspaper at U.Va." mentions in the article to "only daily newspaper at U.Va."
The newspaper infobox is totally non-compliant Wikipedia code -- it's written in HTML, rather than standard Wiki markup. I took the time to mark it up properly, which somebody undid two days later, with the comment "People read the article, not the coding. That old box seems to look a lot better than the June 10th revision." If somebody has a problem with the look of Wikipedia, perhaps it would be best to take that up through proper channels, rather than hacking together an HTML-based workaround.
Unless somebody provides a decent reason for why the Cav Daily's entry should not adhere to Wikipedia standards, I'm going to fix the infobox again. -- WaldoJ 02:17, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
Anyone know why the CD website is offline? Tjarrett ( talk) 16:02, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
Anyone know how to pull old articles from the Cav that don't show up online? Kjs2x ( talk) 16:49, 26 February 2009 (UTC)