This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
A fact from The Card Players appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 April 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the French Government issued a postage stamp (pictured) bringing attention to the theft of
Cézanne's The Card Players in 1961?
Yeah, it's there already; I'll add it to the lead at some point if/when the report is confirmed and more widely publicized.--
Chimino (
talk) 22:05, 4 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Possibly; I agree the article should not be changed to definitively locate the painting in Qatar based off what remains a single source of information.--
Chimino (
talk) 20:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Thanks Modernist, but the issue is all stories point back to the initial Vanity Fair report, which even the NYT and at least one other of those sources state "if confirmed". I believe in the near future the world will know if indeed the purchase was real; from the reading, Qatar plans to roll out many of its treasures for public display, and we'll see if the Cézanne is with them.--
Chimino (
talk) 23:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)bahut bekar painting hai arab pagal ho gayareply
Which version did the Qatar Royal Family buy? The article doesn't say. --
RThompson82 (
talk) 23:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
There is only one version which is privatized, so I think it is fairly obvious. -
Chimino (
talk) 00:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
A fact from The Card Players appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 30 April 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
Did you know... that the French Government issued a postage stamp (pictured) bringing attention to the theft of
Cézanne's The Card Players in 1961?
Yeah, it's there already; I'll add it to the lead at some point if/when the report is confirmed and more widely publicized.--
Chimino (
talk) 22:05, 4 February 2012 (UTC)reply
Possibly; I agree the article should not be changed to definitively locate the painting in Qatar based off what remains a single source of information.--
Chimino (
talk) 20:43, 20 March 2012 (UTC)reply
Thanks Modernist, but the issue is all stories point back to the initial Vanity Fair report, which even the NYT and at least one other of those sources state "if confirmed". I believe in the near future the world will know if indeed the purchase was real; from the reading, Qatar plans to roll out many of its treasures for public display, and we'll see if the Cézanne is with them.--
Chimino (
talk) 23:29, 20 March 2012 (UTC)bahut bekar painting hai arab pagal ho gayareply
Which version did the Qatar Royal Family buy? The article doesn't say. --
RThompson82 (
talk) 23:47, 14 February 2015 (UTC)reply
There is only one version which is privatized, so I think it is fairly obvious. -
Chimino (
talk) 00:30, 10 October 2021 (UTC)reply