![]() | The Brown Daily Herald was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've totally rewritten this article, and hopefully it will be well-received. I can see that some people have already started editing it, which is great. Chaz! 21:26, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Most prominent publication is clear and definite POV. That is just at a glance. Any statement like that needs to be backed with sources or it should be immediately removed. IvoShandor 04:41, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
This article fails to meet the Good article criteria and has, thus, been failed.
You can contest this at GA review, however, I can all but guarantee that this failure will be endorsed.
There are a host of other problems here, recommend a comprehensive Peer review before resubmitting. IvoShandor 06:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)
![]() | The Brown Daily Herald was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've totally rewritten this article, and hopefully it will be well-received. I can see that some people have already started editing it, which is great. Chaz! 21:26, 1 March 2007 (UTC)
Most prominent publication is clear and definite POV. That is just at a glance. Any statement like that needs to be backed with sources or it should be immediately removed. IvoShandor 04:41, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
This article fails to meet the Good article criteria and has, thus, been failed.
You can contest this at GA review, however, I can all but guarantee that this failure will be endorsed.
There are a host of other problems here, recommend a comprehensive Peer review before resubmitting. IvoShandor 06:57, 30 March 2007 (UTC)