This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Blueprint 3 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Please do not edit the "Swagger Like Us" track off of "The Blueprint 3" page. It has been confirmed. Read the source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KyleEshna ( talk • contribs) 01:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
The same song's on T.I.'s album why would it be on both? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.42.9 ( talk) 21:12, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Swagga like us is of course not on both albums. Slu pt 2 is jay's version, ergo this will be the only slu on blueprint 3. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.216.89.99 ( talk) 15:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
All of the songs on this list are complete speculation. Anybody that knows anything about Hov knows he rarely puts those singles that come out before hand on the actual album. Blue Magic was leaked from American Gangster like a few weeks before the release, and he took it off the album and made it a bonus track... —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
128.151.226.240 (
talk)
20:35, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
How does anyone know that's the release date for sure? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.253.244 ( talk) 14:37, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
http://pleasedontstare.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/the-overstanding-on-the-blueprint-3/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.16.75.231 ( talk) 08:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Possible Blueprint 3 track titled "Dreaming Again". Haven't listened to it and did not do a search for a reference but just giving some info.-- Nyj1218 ( talk) 00:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Heard some things about tracks called "Kiss and Tell" featuring The-Dream, "Illest Gangstas" featuring The Game. Recently, heard stuff about a Premo produced track called Real Rap. And a Just Blaze produced Hip Hop In My Words with a Luther Vandross Sample with a Weezy third verse.
-- Piazzajordan2 ( Talk.) 13:45, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Kanye released "Brooklyn (Go Hard)[feat. Santogold](prod. Kanye West)" by Jay on his blog... off the Blueprint 3 possibly? "Brooklyn (Go Hard)"
Where's the source stating it's indeed The Blueprint³, and not just The Blueprint 3 or even The Blueprint III? 130.216.30.234 ( talk) 09:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I think those are all the same thing. If I recall correctly I think the Blueprint 2 was officially The Blueprint2, so maybe it's just being assumed.
Either way I am more curious about where nearly all these speculated tracks are coming from. I follow Jay-Z pretty closely and I haven't heard anything about any of those, aside from the songs already out. Additionally, if the album is really looking to be released in September 2009 I think there is very little chance that Ain't I, Swagga Like Us, Jockin' Jay-Z or Brooklyn (Go Hard) will be on it. It would make no sense and be totally inconsistent with how Jay's dealt with singles in the past. Bknollenberg ( talk) 23:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Timbaland and Jerome "JRoc" Harmon produced 5 tracks for the album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.131.74.178 ( talk) 15:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Where is the source that says the album will have a subscript 3? Every information up to this point says The Blueprint 3. If someone can't find a reliable source for The Blueprint³ the move should be reverted. SE KinG. User page. Talk. 19:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I absolutely agree, the superscript 3 is total speculation, and seems unlikely. 121.44.47.165 ( talk) 07:59, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
The Blueprint³ → The Blueprint 3 — The subscript 3 is purely spectacle. I have yet to see any website claim the album title to be The Blueprint³. SE KinG. User page. Talk. 08:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
So please stop saying in the Singles section and on the page for D.O.A. that D.O.A. is the lead single
it is currently fully leaked on what.cd-- 24.78.46.155 ( talk) 19:31, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Jay-Z commented on the leak —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.248.224.164 ( talk) 00:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
please change the no review section to add a review
|Reviews =
Fmills15 ( talk) 19:51, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thank you for the response. i agree that wiki is not a place for promotion, but i disagree with your methodology however as this review is still creditable. my edit history should have nothing to do with the content and reader contribution itself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmills15 ( talk • contribs) 00:07, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
I've tried multiple times to add a review to this particular entry. Planet Ill had the album reviewed in August and if you read the other reviews many of them took their cue from what was written. It's not an act of self promotion but the reviews are in-depth and credible. Planet Ill is a legitimate unbiased review site. Please check it out. They are often first with reviews.
Dr.deisel (
talk)
23:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC)dr.deisel
I would like to request a Canadian review to be added from BLARE Magazine. link -> http://blaremagazine.com/2009/09/14/album-reviews-14-9-09
Please note we are non-profit and all of our work is to represent artists, not ourselves. It is a true a lot of individuals say this, but we're more focused on providing a voice for music & Canadian entertainment publications. 99.230.239.19 ( talk) 15:01, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Um, every citation for his sales is to a blog written by some 12 year old, can't we find one real source that has his sales? Because I'm going to have to remove the number until somebody does . . . BGRuthless ( talk) 14:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Is there a reference saying that "D.A.N.C.E." is sampled in this track? Dsavage87 ( talk) 18:41, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
I've heard that it will be "Forever Young" or "On to the Next One"... But I heard "So Ambitious" on the radio in Chicago ( 107.5). Plus Pharrell talked the song up. SE KinG. User page. Talk. 07:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
A widely considered one no less? I don't think it is and the line has no references or citatations. The meta-critic rating (65/100) certainly doesn't justify the claim.
94.195.24.129 ( talk) 18:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
I feel this focuses way too much on negative reviews. Thoughts? ~DC Let's Vent 00:45, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
61 on Metacritic is just BARELY positive. You could put mixed for that. But 65 means solid positive. Not critical acclaim, but still positive. AndrewOne ( talk) 17:21, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
The Blueprint 3. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Blueprint 3 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Please do not edit the "Swagger Like Us" track off of "The Blueprint 3" page. It has been confirmed. Read the source. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KyleEshna ( talk • contribs) 01:24, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
The same song's on T.I.'s album why would it be on both? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.42.9 ( talk) 21:12, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Swagga like us is of course not on both albums. Slu pt 2 is jay's version, ergo this will be the only slu on blueprint 3. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.216.89.99 ( talk) 15:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
All of the songs on this list are complete speculation. Anybody that knows anything about Hov knows he rarely puts those singles that come out before hand on the actual album. Blue Magic was leaked from American Gangster like a few weeks before the release, and he took it off the album and made it a bonus track... —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
128.151.226.240 (
talk)
20:35, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
How does anyone know that's the release date for sure? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.175.253.244 ( talk) 14:37, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
http://pleasedontstare.wordpress.com/2008/10/02/the-overstanding-on-the-blueprint-3/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.16.75.231 ( talk) 08:53, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
Possible Blueprint 3 track titled "Dreaming Again". Haven't listened to it and did not do a search for a reference but just giving some info.-- Nyj1218 ( talk) 00:15, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Heard some things about tracks called "Kiss and Tell" featuring The-Dream, "Illest Gangstas" featuring The Game. Recently, heard stuff about a Premo produced track called Real Rap. And a Just Blaze produced Hip Hop In My Words with a Luther Vandross Sample with a Weezy third verse.
-- Piazzajordan2 ( Talk.) 13:45, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
Kanye released "Brooklyn (Go Hard)[feat. Santogold](prod. Kanye West)" by Jay on his blog... off the Blueprint 3 possibly? "Brooklyn (Go Hard)"
Where's the source stating it's indeed The Blueprint³, and not just The Blueprint 3 or even The Blueprint III? 130.216.30.234 ( talk) 09:36, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
I think those are all the same thing. If I recall correctly I think the Blueprint 2 was officially The Blueprint2, so maybe it's just being assumed.
Either way I am more curious about where nearly all these speculated tracks are coming from. I follow Jay-Z pretty closely and I haven't heard anything about any of those, aside from the songs already out. Additionally, if the album is really looking to be released in September 2009 I think there is very little chance that Ain't I, Swagga Like Us, Jockin' Jay-Z or Brooklyn (Go Hard) will be on it. It would make no sense and be totally inconsistent with how Jay's dealt with singles in the past. Bknollenberg ( talk) 23:21, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Timbaland and Jerome "JRoc" Harmon produced 5 tracks for the album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.131.74.178 ( talk) 15:49, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
Where is the source that says the album will have a subscript 3? Every information up to this point says The Blueprint 3. If someone can't find a reliable source for The Blueprint³ the move should be reverted. SE KinG. User page. Talk. 19:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
I absolutely agree, the superscript 3 is total speculation, and seems unlikely. 121.44.47.165 ( talk) 07:59, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
The Blueprint³ → The Blueprint 3 — The subscript 3 is purely spectacle. I have yet to see any website claim the album title to be The Blueprint³. SE KinG. User page. Talk. 08:07, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
So please stop saying in the Singles section and on the page for D.O.A. that D.O.A. is the lead single
it is currently fully leaked on what.cd-- 24.78.46.155 ( talk) 19:31, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Jay-Z commented on the leak —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.248.224.164 ( talk) 00:10, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
please change the no review section to add a review
|Reviews =
Fmills15 ( talk) 19:51, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
thank you for the response. i agree that wiki is not a place for promotion, but i disagree with your methodology however as this review is still creditable. my edit history should have nothing to do with the content and reader contribution itself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmills15 ( talk • contribs) 00:07, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
I've tried multiple times to add a review to this particular entry. Planet Ill had the album reviewed in August and if you read the other reviews many of them took their cue from what was written. It's not an act of self promotion but the reviews are in-depth and credible. Planet Ill is a legitimate unbiased review site. Please check it out. They are often first with reviews.
Dr.deisel (
talk)
23:06, 16 September 2009 (UTC)dr.deisel
I would like to request a Canadian review to be added from BLARE Magazine. link -> http://blaremagazine.com/2009/09/14/album-reviews-14-9-09
Please note we are non-profit and all of our work is to represent artists, not ourselves. It is a true a lot of individuals say this, but we're more focused on providing a voice for music & Canadian entertainment publications. 99.230.239.19 ( talk) 15:01, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Um, every citation for his sales is to a blog written by some 12 year old, can't we find one real source that has his sales? Because I'm going to have to remove the number until somebody does . . . BGRuthless ( talk) 14:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Is there a reference saying that "D.A.N.C.E." is sampled in this track? Dsavage87 ( talk) 18:41, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
I've heard that it will be "Forever Young" or "On to the Next One"... But I heard "So Ambitious" on the radio in Chicago ( 107.5). Plus Pharrell talked the song up. SE KinG. User page. Talk. 07:48, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
A widely considered one no less? I don't think it is and the line has no references or citatations. The meta-critic rating (65/100) certainly doesn't justify the claim.
94.195.24.129 ( talk) 18:35, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
I feel this focuses way too much on negative reviews. Thoughts? ~DC Let's Vent 00:45, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
61 on Metacritic is just BARELY positive. You could put mixed for that. But 65 means solid positive. Not critical acclaim, but still positive. AndrewOne ( talk) 17:21, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
The Blueprint 3. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 19:08, 24 January 2016 (UTC)