This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can
the article attached to this page, help out with the
open tasks, or contribute to the
discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article, as well as all the other ones linked to "List of Fairly Oddparents Episodes" was created to feature further information about the episode that would not fit on the episode list, including tidbits about the specific episode and the expanded plot details.
One page could easily accommodate all episodes. A whole page for this stuff is ridiculous. The guides are poorly written and edited by the way; someone will have to come in and correct typos, etc. Also, the episodes should be numbered, like other television shows. The user should register and log in, by the way, so we can communicate on his or her talk page instead of individual discussion pages.
Paul Klenk02:09, 24 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Further thoughts: I did a look-up for the Seinfeld show; this show has one page for all episodes. You can use it for a model. If a nine-year-running show, the most talked about and watched in history, can accommodate all episodes in one page, then so can The Fairly OddParents. Remember, this isn't a hobby site for you to collect your private thoughts and feelings on arcane matters. Some of your "trivia" items are really reviews of the show. This is not in keeping with Wikipedia. Any opinions about episodes should be deleted. Follow the Seinfeld model and you'll do well. Good luck.
Paul Klenk02:21, 24 August 2005 (UTC)reply
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about
television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can
join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to
animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can
the article attached to this page, help out with the
open tasks, or contribute to the
discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
This article, as well as all the other ones linked to "List of Fairly Oddparents Episodes" was created to feature further information about the episode that would not fit on the episode list, including tidbits about the specific episode and the expanded plot details.
One page could easily accommodate all episodes. A whole page for this stuff is ridiculous. The guides are poorly written and edited by the way; someone will have to come in and correct typos, etc. Also, the episodes should be numbered, like other television shows. The user should register and log in, by the way, so we can communicate on his or her talk page instead of individual discussion pages.
Paul Klenk02:09, 24 August 2005 (UTC)reply
Further thoughts: I did a look-up for the Seinfeld show; this show has one page for all episodes. You can use it for a model. If a nine-year-running show, the most talked about and watched in history, can accommodate all episodes in one page, then so can The Fairly OddParents. Remember, this isn't a hobby site for you to collect your private thoughts and feelings on arcane matters. Some of your "trivia" items are really reviews of the show. This is not in keeping with Wikipedia. Any opinions about episodes should be deleted. Follow the Seinfeld model and you'll do well. Good luck.
Paul Klenk02:21, 24 August 2005 (UTC)reply