The Big O was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Paradigm City was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 March 2010 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into The Big O. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Paradigm City was copied or moved into The Big O with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
I just did some editing to the lead section. I'm new at this, so I'd appreciate any mistakes I may have made be pointed out so I don't make them again.
I hope this to be the first of my contributions to The Big O article. This is one of my all-time favorite animes, and I'd like this article to reach A-status.
--- The before was an unsigned comment, from I don't know who, sorry.
>>>Here's hoping. Also, if someone could look at Dastun's profile, that last sentence is niggling at me as awkward, but I don't know how to make it flow better.
13:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)~
23:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
24.199.154.18 23:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC) Regarding the lead section/introduction information (and I am desprately trying to find evidence, hence the notation here and not an edit to the article) - I am positive that in the mid-90's (I want to say 1996) is when the first thirteen Big O episodes aired in the USA, on Cartoon Networks "Toonami" in the afternoon, around 3pm CST. It aired on and off for a few months, every weekday, then vanished till the re-emergance date, which did well enough to earn the second season. So far, I have not had any luck in finding proof (even IMDB has the later date), so I've emailed Toonami directly, hoping for a reply.23:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
24.199.154.18
23:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
The plot section has been revised, but far from complete. I'm thinking some sub-sections about the factions in Paradigm (Paradigm Corporation, the Military Police, and The Union) should be included. So, anyone? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nohansen ( talk • contribs) .
I propose the Setting section be split into its own article. The article is getting kinda big, and since "Setting" is the biggest section it makes sense (to me). In a separate article it could be better edited and serves its purpose(s) better. Heck, Gotham has its own article. Why not Paradigm?-- Nohansen 13:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
i Particularily agree to the splitting of paradigim city its too long and if someone was lookin for something might not want an exhuberently long article-- Spartan117009 22:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
I tried to avoid it, I don't like deleting other people's work, but some things just had to go. Other, were out of place. If someone would start work on SteveA026's suggested List of allusions in The Big O, they could be reincorporated.-- Nohansen 15:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
This seems like a very good article to me. The only things I can point is that the writing, if good, is sometimes a little weak, specially in the lead. And the text about the characters should wrap to get rid of the white space. Ah, also, I'm sure the first sentence of the "style" part could be rephrased to make sure it is not OR at all. I'll come back for a more thorough review. Cheers!-- SidiLemine 16:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Here are some problems that I have found:
Writing:
Context:
-- Squilibob 10:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm wondering: What does an article need to be featured? 'Cause right now, I'm just about tapped out of ideas on what to do with the article.-- Nohansen 04:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I have seen all the episodes of Big O and something keeps on getting me, how old is Roger Smith? I have heard that he 25, 30, and 40. He helped Gordon Rosewater rebuild Paradigm after the Event(as seen in picture I think form episode 25) which means he must be old. He doesn't have gray hair. Could date Dorothy. Around episode 13 and 14, his flash back suggested that he was poor 40 years ago and the same age that he is now. Also, is the real Roger Smith an actor? Big O was a comic on the back of a newspaper and it was a play. Another thing is Roger being an android. His he? There was a mass production of Roger's in episode 26. Tell me what you think.-- RogerSmith026 01:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
I've watched the series all the way through probably at least a half dozen times, and I think that several aspects of the show are up to interpretation. The first time I watched any Big O episodes I couldn't understand how Roger looked to be about 30 or so, but Dastun stated that they knew each other before the event 40 years ago and "flashbacks and hallucinations during the series would seem to indicate that he was a member of the military before the Event occurred, apparently holding the rank of Major." It is also "implied by Gordon Rosewater that Roger was alive before the Event and was not one of Gordon's genetically created children. Both he and Gordon refer to Roger having "lost memories" even though he appears to be in his mid twenties. Gordon specifically mentions a contract that he made with Roger prior to the Event." And the torn photograph that Gordon puts together in the last episode shows a much younger Gordon shaking hands with Roger who appears exactly the same as he did in the series. My interpretation is that Roger from the series is an android based on the negotiator that Gordon had met and worked with in his early days, I believe this is exactly what Gordon tells Roger and he then has a vision of an assembly line full of Rogers being created. All of the quoted sections here are from this wiki page: /info/en/?search=List_of_The_Big_O_characters
Roger worked for the military police before becoming a negotiator, it's not likely that he was ever an actual actor, rather since all of the people from Paradigm City could not remember their past they were all like actors portraying the person they think that they are- numerous characters also mention that Paradigm City is a stage, or like a stage, this is probably because the people of the city are all playing their roles. Schwarzwald was not happy with his role as a reporter, he kept digging deeper and deeper into the truth of what happened 40 years ago, so Paradigm Corporation tried to kill him- he survived but his face was severely disfigured. This is an example of what happens to people who step outside of their role. As to the comic book in the flashback, I think that it could have been some other animation (like Charlie Brown aha) but Roger couldn't remember such a minor detail, so he filled in the blank spaces in his memory with something from his subconscious mind. As to the play, I don't think that was supposed to be what really happened and that's why the faces of the audience had no details, they were solid black. I think the dialog could have been roughly the same and it would have taken place in Roger's new, actual home and not on a stage- the stage was symbolic for the city, a city where no one knows exactly who they are or where they're from so they're like actors. Akechi77 ( talk) 18:25, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Long story short: Roger Smith is Jesus. Not Catholic Jesus, not South Baptism Jesus, no, not even Raptor Jesus. He's GNOSTIC Jesus. Yay. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.176.185.207 ( talk) 16:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC).
The tomatoes had the lost memory's of paradigm's prominent citizens not Roger Smith's. Roger's is not one of the tomatoes and his true origin is never fully explained-- 75.168.110.65 04:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I just have to ask, what is with the Tomatoes? Of all the episodes Ive seen (im probably missing a few) I dont think it never explained enough about the tomatoes for me to fully understand their importance, but this discussion page have given me some insight and I think the whole tomatoes thing should be explained in the main article; that is unless everyone else is as confused about the tomatoes as I am. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.196.8.102 ( talk) 03:54, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, the reviewer forgot to put the tag on the candidates page. Wiki-newbie 20:23, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Yeah. Wiki-newbie 16:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
I've mentioned this at the List of Allusions page, but I'll mention it here too. The soundtrack of The Big O! is packed full of references to other works, and I'd like to see it mentioned in the main article, if we can find citations.
The track Respect is a clear nod to the music of 60's British adventure shows like The Prisoner and Danger Man, while the theme Stand a Chance is a reworking of Vangelis' Blade Runner End Titles. Meanwhile False has more than a hint of Connery-era James Bond about it, and the main theme is, of course, a clear homage to Queen's Flash! I wouldn't know where to begin to look for references to this stuff, but it's definitely in there. Kelvingreen 15:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't think this page means that Wikipedia considers all FreeWebs pages spam. FreeWebs is just a free web host like Geocities or Tripod. Besides, many other sites are listed here that are not necessarily spam, such as YouTube, Angelfire, FreeBSD.org, and Yahoo Groups. -- SteveA026 17:22, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone know if there is going to be a re-release of the second season boxed set like the new Anime Legends release of season one? Argel1200 23:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Behold! ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Anyone know why the sentence mentioning Super Robot Wars Destiny and Sunrise World War was removed in this edit? -- DocumentN ( talk) 20:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Like I said in WT:MOS-AM, no one but AnmaFinotera has objected to the way this article is organized. Others users have agreed the MoS is just a guideline and formatting that doesn't exactly fit into the current MoS is fine as long as it still follows the spirit of WP:MOS-AM. In addition, AnmaFinotera's attempt of bringing the article in line with the MoS damaged the way the information is organized. Since I never intended to use the "Media" section the same way other articles use it, the prose seems clunky and doesn't flow any better.
Furthermore, I "proposed" a change based on my experience editing articles. If the layout I propose (or some reasonable facsimile) is the layout the editors involved in the discussion prefer, it won't be expected of anyone else to follow it to the letter. Articles that look like what this article looked like before my most recent edit won't have to change because Animanga Manual of Style says so. The MoS is a list of recommendations. The MoS is flexible. The MoS is a guideline, not policy.
If AnmaFinotera, or anyone else, has any issues with the way this article is organized, please bring it up in the talk page first. I know I don't WP:OWN this article, but I've maintained it to the very best of my abilities since it made GA. If you're going to argue for a change, please bring an argument other than "follow the MOS". Because, to quote Juhachi, "using the oh well, here's the MOS, so there argument is cheap".
I don't willfully ignore the guidelines. I knowingly work within them to achieve the best work possible... even if it means veering from them just a little.
Ignore all rules: always a policy and one of the five pillars. Thank you.-- Nohansen ( talk) 00:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
AnmaFinotera: if you could point out the issues you have with the article, rather than "drive-by tagging" it, you'd be a big help. Now:
So, what do you want? What do you need?-- Nohansen ( talk) 22:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Well...
I won't login for the next couple of days, but I'll see if I can continue the clean up offline. The job is never done.-- Nohansen ( talk) 23:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Why isn't the most obvious influence listed: Gigantor
Y'all may find this reference useful: http://web.archive.org/web/20010706135824/http://j-pop.com/anime/news/top10.html
It gives top-10 sales rankings of anime in the US & Japan. This is included in the list. -- Gwern (contribs) 01:30 26 January 2010 (GMT)
An image used in this article, File:Paradigm City.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 16 November 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 22:40, 16 November 2011 (UTC) |
The Paradigm City page should be restored as seperate page. Like the megadues's there was enough separate information shown in the anime. The fictional cities for the Batman and Superman comics are listed on individual pages. Enough background information is revealed in the anime series to require a seperate page for Paradigm City.
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Paradigm_City
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Paradigm_City&redirect=no
174.22.9.141 ( talk) 17:48, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Paradigm city doesn't have enough information to be as a separate topic, and by that, there's not enough third-party sources covering it's importance. Lucia Black ( talk) 02:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
What about the Batman ( Gotham City) and Superman ( Metropolis (comics)) comics? How are they different? They also have categories.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Metropolis_(comics)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Gotham_City
174.22.10.219 ( talk) 22:27, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
174.22.10.55 ( talk) 17:45, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Animefringe review: [1] Ex overview (archive): [2] -- Lucia Black ( talk) 05:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on The Big O. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
The Big O was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Paradigm City was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 13 March 2010 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into The Big O. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
Text and/or other creative content from this version of Paradigm City was copied or moved into The Big O with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
I just did some editing to the lead section. I'm new at this, so I'd appreciate any mistakes I may have made be pointed out so I don't make them again.
I hope this to be the first of my contributions to The Big O article. This is one of my all-time favorite animes, and I'd like this article to reach A-status.
--- The before was an unsigned comment, from I don't know who, sorry.
>>>Here's hoping. Also, if someone could look at Dastun's profile, that last sentence is niggling at me as awkward, but I don't know how to make it flow better.
13:25, 30 June 2007 (UTC)~
23:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
24.199.154.18 23:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC) Regarding the lead section/introduction information (and I am desprately trying to find evidence, hence the notation here and not an edit to the article) - I am positive that in the mid-90's (I want to say 1996) is when the first thirteen Big O episodes aired in the USA, on Cartoon Networks "Toonami" in the afternoon, around 3pm CST. It aired on and off for a few months, every weekday, then vanished till the re-emergance date, which did well enough to earn the second season. So far, I have not had any luck in finding proof (even IMDB has the later date), so I've emailed Toonami directly, hoping for a reply.23:52, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
24.199.154.18
23:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
The plot section has been revised, but far from complete. I'm thinking some sub-sections about the factions in Paradigm (Paradigm Corporation, the Military Police, and The Union) should be included. So, anyone? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nohansen ( talk • contribs) .
I propose the Setting section be split into its own article. The article is getting kinda big, and since "Setting" is the biggest section it makes sense (to me). In a separate article it could be better edited and serves its purpose(s) better. Heck, Gotham has its own article. Why not Paradigm?-- Nohansen 13:47, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
i Particularily agree to the splitting of paradigim city its too long and if someone was lookin for something might not want an exhuberently long article-- Spartan117009 22:06, 9 December 2006 (UTC)
I tried to avoid it, I don't like deleting other people's work, but some things just had to go. Other, were out of place. If someone would start work on SteveA026's suggested List of allusions in The Big O, they could be reincorporated.-- Nohansen 15:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC)
This seems like a very good article to me. The only things I can point is that the writing, if good, is sometimes a little weak, specially in the lead. And the text about the characters should wrap to get rid of the white space. Ah, also, I'm sure the first sentence of the "style" part could be rephrased to make sure it is not OR at all. I'll come back for a more thorough review. Cheers!-- SidiLemine 16:09, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
Here are some problems that I have found:
Writing:
Context:
-- Squilibob 10:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm wondering: What does an article need to be featured? 'Cause right now, I'm just about tapped out of ideas on what to do with the article.-- Nohansen 04:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
I have seen all the episodes of Big O and something keeps on getting me, how old is Roger Smith? I have heard that he 25, 30, and 40. He helped Gordon Rosewater rebuild Paradigm after the Event(as seen in picture I think form episode 25) which means he must be old. He doesn't have gray hair. Could date Dorothy. Around episode 13 and 14, his flash back suggested that he was poor 40 years ago and the same age that he is now. Also, is the real Roger Smith an actor? Big O was a comic on the back of a newspaper and it was a play. Another thing is Roger being an android. His he? There was a mass production of Roger's in episode 26. Tell me what you think.-- RogerSmith026 01:16, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
I've watched the series all the way through probably at least a half dozen times, and I think that several aspects of the show are up to interpretation. The first time I watched any Big O episodes I couldn't understand how Roger looked to be about 30 or so, but Dastun stated that they knew each other before the event 40 years ago and "flashbacks and hallucinations during the series would seem to indicate that he was a member of the military before the Event occurred, apparently holding the rank of Major." It is also "implied by Gordon Rosewater that Roger was alive before the Event and was not one of Gordon's genetically created children. Both he and Gordon refer to Roger having "lost memories" even though he appears to be in his mid twenties. Gordon specifically mentions a contract that he made with Roger prior to the Event." And the torn photograph that Gordon puts together in the last episode shows a much younger Gordon shaking hands with Roger who appears exactly the same as he did in the series. My interpretation is that Roger from the series is an android based on the negotiator that Gordon had met and worked with in his early days, I believe this is exactly what Gordon tells Roger and he then has a vision of an assembly line full of Rogers being created. All of the quoted sections here are from this wiki page: /info/en/?search=List_of_The_Big_O_characters
Roger worked for the military police before becoming a negotiator, it's not likely that he was ever an actual actor, rather since all of the people from Paradigm City could not remember their past they were all like actors portraying the person they think that they are- numerous characters also mention that Paradigm City is a stage, or like a stage, this is probably because the people of the city are all playing their roles. Schwarzwald was not happy with his role as a reporter, he kept digging deeper and deeper into the truth of what happened 40 years ago, so Paradigm Corporation tried to kill him- he survived but his face was severely disfigured. This is an example of what happens to people who step outside of their role. As to the comic book in the flashback, I think that it could have been some other animation (like Charlie Brown aha) but Roger couldn't remember such a minor detail, so he filled in the blank spaces in his memory with something from his subconscious mind. As to the play, I don't think that was supposed to be what really happened and that's why the faces of the audience had no details, they were solid black. I think the dialog could have been roughly the same and it would have taken place in Roger's new, actual home and not on a stage- the stage was symbolic for the city, a city where no one knows exactly who they are or where they're from so they're like actors. Akechi77 ( talk) 18:25, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
Long story short: Roger Smith is Jesus. Not Catholic Jesus, not South Baptism Jesus, no, not even Raptor Jesus. He's GNOSTIC Jesus. Yay. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.176.185.207 ( talk) 16:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC).
The tomatoes had the lost memory's of paradigm's prominent citizens not Roger Smith's. Roger's is not one of the tomatoes and his true origin is never fully explained-- 75.168.110.65 04:54, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
I just have to ask, what is with the Tomatoes? Of all the episodes Ive seen (im probably missing a few) I dont think it never explained enough about the tomatoes for me to fully understand their importance, but this discussion page have given me some insight and I think the whole tomatoes thing should be explained in the main article; that is unless everyone else is as confused about the tomatoes as I am. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.196.8.102 ( talk) 03:54, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, the reviewer forgot to put the tag on the candidates page. Wiki-newbie 20:23, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
Yeah. Wiki-newbie 16:21, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
I've mentioned this at the List of Allusions page, but I'll mention it here too. The soundtrack of The Big O! is packed full of references to other works, and I'd like to see it mentioned in the main article, if we can find citations.
The track Respect is a clear nod to the music of 60's British adventure shows like The Prisoner and Danger Man, while the theme Stand a Chance is a reworking of Vangelis' Blade Runner End Titles. Meanwhile False has more than a hint of Connery-era James Bond about it, and the main theme is, of course, a clear homage to Queen's Flash! I wouldn't know where to begin to look for references to this stuff, but it's definitely in there. Kelvingreen 15:31, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
I don't think this page means that Wikipedia considers all FreeWebs pages spam. FreeWebs is just a free web host like Geocities or Tripod. Besides, many other sites are listed here that are not necessarily spam, such as YouTube, Angelfire, FreeBSD.org, and Yahoo Groups. -- SteveA026 17:22, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
Does anyone know if there is going to be a re-release of the second season boxed set like the new Anime Legends release of season one? Argel1200 23:38, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
Behold! ··· 日本穣 ? · Talk to Nihonjoe 02:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
Anyone know why the sentence mentioning Super Robot Wars Destiny and Sunrise World War was removed in this edit? -- DocumentN ( talk) 20:39, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
Like I said in WT:MOS-AM, no one but AnmaFinotera has objected to the way this article is organized. Others users have agreed the MoS is just a guideline and formatting that doesn't exactly fit into the current MoS is fine as long as it still follows the spirit of WP:MOS-AM. In addition, AnmaFinotera's attempt of bringing the article in line with the MoS damaged the way the information is organized. Since I never intended to use the "Media" section the same way other articles use it, the prose seems clunky and doesn't flow any better.
Furthermore, I "proposed" a change based on my experience editing articles. If the layout I propose (or some reasonable facsimile) is the layout the editors involved in the discussion prefer, it won't be expected of anyone else to follow it to the letter. Articles that look like what this article looked like before my most recent edit won't have to change because Animanga Manual of Style says so. The MoS is a list of recommendations. The MoS is flexible. The MoS is a guideline, not policy.
If AnmaFinotera, or anyone else, has any issues with the way this article is organized, please bring it up in the talk page first. I know I don't WP:OWN this article, but I've maintained it to the very best of my abilities since it made GA. If you're going to argue for a change, please bring an argument other than "follow the MOS". Because, to quote Juhachi, "using the oh well, here's the MOS, so there argument is cheap".
I don't willfully ignore the guidelines. I knowingly work within them to achieve the best work possible... even if it means veering from them just a little.
Ignore all rules: always a policy and one of the five pillars. Thank you.-- Nohansen ( talk) 00:09, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
AnmaFinotera: if you could point out the issues you have with the article, rather than "drive-by tagging" it, you'd be a big help. Now:
So, what do you want? What do you need?-- Nohansen ( talk) 22:51, 30 June 2008 (UTC)
Well...
I won't login for the next couple of days, but I'll see if I can continue the clean up offline. The job is never done.-- Nohansen ( talk) 23:57, 2 July 2008 (UTC)
Why isn't the most obvious influence listed: Gigantor
Y'all may find this reference useful: http://web.archive.org/web/20010706135824/http://j-pop.com/anime/news/top10.html
It gives top-10 sales rankings of anime in the US & Japan. This is included in the list. -- Gwern (contribs) 01:30 26 January 2010 (GMT)
An image used in this article, File:Paradigm City.JPG, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 16 November 2011
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 22:40, 16 November 2011 (UTC) |
The Paradigm City page should be restored as seperate page. Like the megadues's there was enough separate information shown in the anime. The fictional cities for the Batman and Superman comics are listed on individual pages. Enough background information is revealed in the anime series to require a seperate page for Paradigm City.
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Paradigm_City
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=Paradigm_City&redirect=no
174.22.9.141 ( talk) 17:48, 30 July 2013 (UTC)
Paradigm city doesn't have enough information to be as a separate topic, and by that, there's not enough third-party sources covering it's importance. Lucia Black ( talk) 02:32, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
What about the Batman ( Gotham City) and Superman ( Metropolis (comics)) comics? How are they different? They also have categories.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Metropolis_(comics)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Gotham_City
174.22.10.219 ( talk) 22:27, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
174.22.10.55 ( talk) 17:45, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Animefringe review: [1] Ex overview (archive): [2] -- Lucia Black ( talk) 05:44, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 8 external links on The Big O. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:13, 12 May 2017 (UTC)