This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Danny Boyle wanted Ewan McGregor for the lead role, but was over ruled by the studios who wanted a bigger name [1]. I think this merits a mention. Whenrybruce 04:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I've taken out the bit saying "rumour has it..." as that is definitely not encyclopaedic, but I've left the other bit in. However, I'm not sure a trivia section consisting of one sentence is entirely necessary... Vanityjunkie 21:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Image:TheBeachdicaprio.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 06:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:The beach poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 02:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
I find the revert done by User:Sgeureka very strange. A lot of text was deleted without any discussion what so ever. Is there some here rule that I have missed? I propose that the original text should be reinserted and that any errors are rather removed. It could be that the section is long, but on the other hand - there are dozens of pages about the three Category:Star_Wars movies. Nine sections about this movie should not be a problem. I will, if I remember, do it myself at some point unless there are any protests. (Note: I am not checking my watch page that often.) --mabahj 21:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Is this film really from the United States? I mean i see the majority is British actors with a few exception's, not to mention the director and producer. The original novel is also from a british writer. The only american thing i notice is a few actors and obviously 20th century fox. can someone explain to me please, thanks -- Tukogbani ( talk) 12:54, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
I agree completely, United Kingdom should at the very least be listed as a secondary country. 22:21 20th September 2009 (UTC)
What does it matter? The movie is horrible, so you may not want to claim credit for it being mostly British. I loved the book however, bought it in Bangkok and read it in 2 days. Wonderful. Spiromilhous ( talk) 09:40, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Although released in a time when i was not interested in music and i was quite young i saw that NEW ORDER were on the soundtrack with brutal
but they were on hiatus at that time
or was that a song special for the movie ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.2.134.90 ( talk) 15:41, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Danny Boyle wanted Ewan McGregor for the lead role, but was over ruled by the studios who wanted a bigger name [1]. I think this merits a mention. Whenrybruce 04:54, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
I've taken out the bit saying "rumour has it..." as that is definitely not encyclopaedic, but I've left the other bit in. However, I'm not sure a trivia section consisting of one sentence is entirely necessary... Vanityjunkie 21:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
Image:TheBeachdicaprio.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 06:33, 19 December 2007 (UTC)
Image:The beach poster.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot ( talk) 02:32, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
I find the revert done by User:Sgeureka very strange. A lot of text was deleted without any discussion what so ever. Is there some here rule that I have missed? I propose that the original text should be reinserted and that any errors are rather removed. It could be that the section is long, but on the other hand - there are dozens of pages about the three Category:Star_Wars movies. Nine sections about this movie should not be a problem. I will, if I remember, do it myself at some point unless there are any protests. (Note: I am not checking my watch page that often.) --mabahj 21:23, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Is this film really from the United States? I mean i see the majority is British actors with a few exception's, not to mention the director and producer. The original novel is also from a british writer. The only american thing i notice is a few actors and obviously 20th century fox. can someone explain to me please, thanks -- Tukogbani ( talk) 12:54, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
I agree completely, United Kingdom should at the very least be listed as a secondary country. 22:21 20th September 2009 (UTC)
What does it matter? The movie is horrible, so you may not want to claim credit for it being mostly British. I loved the book however, bought it in Bangkok and read it in 2 days. Wonderful. Spiromilhous ( talk) 09:40, 8 June 2011 (UTC)
Although released in a time when i was not interested in music and i was quite young i saw that NEW ORDER were on the soundtrack with brutal
but they were on hiatus at that time
or was that a song special for the movie ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.2.134.90 ( talk) 15:41, 30 December 2015 (UTC)