This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is a phrase coined by Ayn Rand and only used by her followers. When others use it, it is usually in quotes. AFAIK, Rand never explicity defined the term. It is clearly not NPOV and should be removed unless someone can explain to me why isn't. -- dm (talk) 21:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
I have eliminated a statement saying that TOC is willing to work with non-Objectivists on "joint projects" (implying that ARI isn't) because ARI does so as well; they often invite people like Daniel Pipes to speak at their events and sell the works of Ludwig von Mises and Thomas Sowell. They've also (I believe) worked with Wafa Sultan. 24.25.214.253 23:37, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
An objectivist group is canvassing its members to edit Ayn Rand related articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Turnsmoney ( talk • contribs) 18:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
An IP editor has repeatedly attempted to insert the label "right-wing" into the lead, based on an interpretation of the organization's Instagram posts. This is obvious original research, so I have reverted this description. In the spirit of WP:BRD, I'm opening a discussion here. -- RL0919 ( talk) 19:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Is there any third-party RS coverage of the Atlas Society? The sources here are two primary sources, a press release and a book. Looking at the book, it only has passing mentions of any of the names "Institute for Objectivist Studies", "Objectivist Center" or "Atlas Society" - it notes their existence, but nothing of substance. Looking for third-party RSes, I find a pile of passing mentions and a lot of press releases - but no RS coverage in depth. Is there any? - David Gerard ( talk) 22:43, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is a phrase coined by Ayn Rand and only used by her followers. When others use it, it is usually in quotes. AFAIK, Rand never explicity defined the term. It is clearly not NPOV and should be removed unless someone can explain to me why isn't. -- dm (talk) 21:09, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
I have eliminated a statement saying that TOC is willing to work with non-Objectivists on "joint projects" (implying that ARI isn't) because ARI does so as well; they often invite people like Daniel Pipes to speak at their events and sell the works of Ludwig von Mises and Thomas Sowell. They've also (I believe) worked with Wafa Sultan. 24.25.214.253 23:37, 12 June 2006 (UTC)
An objectivist group is canvassing its members to edit Ayn Rand related articles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Turnsmoney ( talk • contribs) 18:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
An IP editor has repeatedly attempted to insert the label "right-wing" into the lead, based on an interpretation of the organization's Instagram posts. This is obvious original research, so I have reverted this description. In the spirit of WP:BRD, I'm opening a discussion here. -- RL0919 ( talk) 19:07, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
Is there any third-party RS coverage of the Atlas Society? The sources here are two primary sources, a press release and a book. Looking at the book, it only has passing mentions of any of the names "Institute for Objectivist Studies", "Objectivist Center" or "Atlas Society" - it notes their existence, but nothing of substance. Looking for third-party RSes, I find a pile of passing mentions and a lot of press releases - but no RS coverage in depth. Is there any? - David Gerard ( talk) 22:43, 7 November 2021 (UTC)