 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
,_early_1900s,_Central_Africa,_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo,_Pende_people,_wood,_fiber_-_Cleveland_Museum_of_Art_-_DSC08700.JPG){kind=small}
i would like to know if anyone out there has actually had any success trying this.
yup. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.145.149 ( talk) 07:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Removed link to external commercial website from "See Also" section. This section should be reserved for wiki entries. At best, the commercial site may be used in references if it is used for source material in the article; otherwise it counts as blatant misuse of editing privileges for personal gain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.65.212 ( talk) 03:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
The article is discussing the Art of Dreaming as a process, not the book. Perhaps a disambiguation page is needed. (````) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nortonmansfield ( talk • contribs) 04:32, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
The article starts off "The Art of Dreaming is a non-fictional book". I think there is not a scintilla of evidence that the book recounts actual events. In any event, the sentence is controversial, and requires evidence and the support of reliable independent references. Surely the editors knew that, in the opinion of skeptics, the whole range of Castenada books are fiction? Macdonald-ross ( talk) 20:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
i would like to know if anyone out there has actually had any success trying this.
yup. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.208.145.149 ( talk) 07:42, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
Removed link to external commercial website from "See Also" section. This section should be reserved for wiki entries. At best, the commercial site may be used in references if it is used for source material in the article; otherwise it counts as blatant misuse of editing privileges for personal gain. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.65.212 ( talk) 03:12, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
The article is discussing the Art of Dreaming as a process, not the book. Perhaps a disambiguation page is needed. (````) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nortonmansfield ( talk • contribs) 04:32, 30 August 2011 (UTC)
The article starts off "The Art of Dreaming is a non-fictional book". I think there is not a scintilla of evidence that the book recounts actual events. In any event, the sentence is controversial, and requires evidence and the support of reliable independent references. Surely the editors knew that, in the opinion of skeptics, the whole range of Castenada books are fiction? Macdonald-ross ( talk) 20:51, 18 November 2012 (UTC)