This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Argument (Fugazi album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Overview section consists of nothing but POV material. No sources are cited for a single review, and claiming that "one is hard pressed to find a single dissenting view of the album" is ridiculously POV and most likely original research. Although not a POV issue, no sources are cited for the analysis of any of the songs or quotes. -- 170.28.224.114 16:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Is it just me who liked the old version (the one with information to every song, from August 31) much better? 84.156.216.232 11:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
I was trying to find out about a type of particle involving the new partical accelerator (I don't know how to spell it) and when I typed in Strangelight, I was redirected here. Why?-- 192.91.147.35 ( talk) 12:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this retrospective review of The Argument. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the review and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the professional reviews section on this page. I appreciate your time.
Crawdaddy! (favorable)
[1]
Mike harkin (
talk)
20:57, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Argument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
The Argument (Fugazi album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Overview section consists of nothing but POV material. No sources are cited for a single review, and claiming that "one is hard pressed to find a single dissenting view of the album" is ridiculously POV and most likely original research. Although not a POV issue, no sources are cited for the analysis of any of the songs or quotes. -- 170.28.224.114 16:26, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
Is it just me who liked the old version (the one with information to every song, from August 31) much better? 84.156.216.232 11:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
I was trying to find out about a type of particle involving the new partical accelerator (I don't know how to spell it) and when I typed in Strangelight, I was redirected here. Why?-- 192.91.147.35 ( talk) 12:42, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
As an editor at Crawdaddy!, and to comply with COI guidelines, I am not posting the link to this retrospective review of The Argument. However, I would like to recommend it on its merits, and hope that an editor will find the time to examine the review and—if he or she sees fit—post it to the professional reviews section on this page. I appreciate your time.
Crawdaddy! (favorable)
[1]
Mike harkin (
talk)
20:57, 27 August 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on The Argument. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:23, 10 December 2017 (UTC)