![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 September 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Lead will need to be amended over time, but we do need to know if the BBC scheduled it for Autumn in order to avoid clashing with the main sporting events of this Year and the EU Referendum in the UK. Any other info should be things of a significant nature; saying something happened and then adding in brackets around "(like in Series 10)" shouldn't be done. GUtt01 ( talk) 23:50, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Please don't include these pieces of information for an upcoming episode, for the following reasons:
Other pieces of info for the episode must be written after the broadcast of the episode. Do not include info on the winner if it is leaked out by a media website; Wikipedia is not designed to act like a spoiler for shows. If there is a leak, state in notes about this after the episode has been broadcast. GUtt01 ( talk) 09:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Please don't include information about a candidate who has left/quit the process, without providing proof. No citation equals deletion of this information. Also, "Quit/Left" should be after "Reward", not before "Task/Task Review". GUtt01 ( talk) 09:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
I think I might have found something that could be a possible controversy regarding a candidate, but want other people's opinions. It relates to a news article about Alana, and her making racist comments on social media. If people check it out, could they determine if it is significant enough to be included into the Controversy section (HIDDEN at the time of this being made)? GUtt01 ( talk) 19:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Please leave Left where it is from now on, as there is no need to move it up around Task & Task Review. It has in brackets when the candidate left and should not be moved around. Could Wiki editors, regardless of being registered or IP Users, refrain from moving it in future. Thank you. GUtt01 ( talk) 15:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Just from a readability point of view, despite it being probably assumable anyway, I'd propose an additional row to be added to the second row of the elimination chart that has week number added. Such as
Elimination chart | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week/Episode (number) | ||||||||||||
Candidate | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
The wording is up for suggestion. Just a thought really. eeveeman ( talk) 09:33, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=The_Apprentice_(UK_series_twelve)&diff=prev&oldid=754593682
I implemented a new style performance chart, however this edit was immediately reversed with no discussion started. I have started one at Talk:The Apprentice (UK series fourteen)#New performance chart. Sr88, talk. 22:48, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 27 September 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Lead will need to be amended over time, but we do need to know if the BBC scheduled it for Autumn in order to avoid clashing with the main sporting events of this Year and the EU Referendum in the UK. Any other info should be things of a significant nature; saying something happened and then adding in brackets around "(like in Series 10)" shouldn't be done. GUtt01 ( talk) 23:50, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Please don't include these pieces of information for an upcoming episode, for the following reasons:
Other pieces of info for the episode must be written after the broadcast of the episode. Do not include info on the winner if it is leaked out by a media website; Wikipedia is not designed to act like a spoiler for shows. If there is a leak, state in notes about this after the episode has been broadcast. GUtt01 ( talk) 09:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
Please don't include information about a candidate who has left/quit the process, without providing proof. No citation equals deletion of this information. Also, "Quit/Left" should be after "Reward", not before "Task/Task Review". GUtt01 ( talk) 09:24, 27 October 2016 (UTC)
I think I might have found something that could be a possible controversy regarding a candidate, but want other people's opinions. It relates to a news article about Alana, and her making racist comments on social media. If people check it out, could they determine if it is significant enough to be included into the Controversy section (HIDDEN at the time of this being made)? GUtt01 ( talk) 19:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
Please leave Left where it is from now on, as there is no need to move it up around Task & Task Review. It has in brackets when the candidate left and should not be moved around. Could Wiki editors, regardless of being registered or IP Users, refrain from moving it in future. Thank you. GUtt01 ( talk) 15:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Just from a readability point of view, despite it being probably assumable anyway, I'd propose an additional row to be added to the second row of the elimination chart that has week number added. Such as
Elimination chart | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week/Episode (number) | ||||||||||||
Candidate | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
The wording is up for suggestion. Just a thought really. eeveeman ( talk) 09:33, 20 November 2016 (UTC)
https://en.wikipedia.org/?title=The_Apprentice_(UK_series_twelve)&diff=prev&oldid=754593682
I implemented a new style performance chart, however this edit was immediately reversed with no discussion started. I have started one at Talk:The Apprentice (UK series fourteen)#New performance chart. Sr88, talk. 22:48, 26 September 2018 (UTC)