This article was nominated for deletion on 27 September 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm sorry to be awkward, but unless there's a reliable source available for the baby-show (because self-published sources like Flickr aren't accepted), then the information will have to stay out. ╟─ Treasury Tag► contribs─╢ 07:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
I've done some very rough work updating the page for week 2 and week 3. However, it was a very rough update, with little detail. Please feel free to change and improve what I've done. I'll continue work on it tomorrow if no one gets to it first. Jozal ( talk) 21:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Yesterday, I included the ratings from the BARB website. However, someone has changed these to DigitalSpy, although I believe BARB to be more reliable. However, if experienced editors would like to contribute, then please do so. I feel that BARB are much more reliable and have a good validity, whereas DigitalSpy doesn't. However, I'd like to know which source to use so I can therefore proceed editing the ratings? 86.134.230.47 ( talk) 19:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Not surprised that my edits yesterday were reverted, but there is no easy way to tell how often any particular candidate has been on the winning team, without looking up and down each column to see if there is a B in a square of the same colour. Any suggestions as to how this could be done while keeping the table reasonably clean? I had put an 'L' in the squares for losing team members but apparently that was too cluttered. Perhaps have a different colour for winning or losing team rather than Ignite/Empire, and a new row saying which team won? I think it is more useful to know whether a candidate won or lost than whether they were on Empire or Ignite. Anguswalker ( talk) 11:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
I have now changed the table's colours and added an extra row. Now the winning team is always pink and the losing team always purple. You can now tell at a glance how often any individual has won and how often each team has won when you couldn't before, and I don't think it is too cluttered. Happy to alter the previous series' tables in the same way if desired. Anguswalker ( talk) 09:40, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure if anyone else is aware, but before the most recent episode at least 2 people edited the article with the correct person who was fired. Admittedly, they both could be guessing, but they would have lucky guesses and surely if they were just guesses they wouldn't have straight up edited the article... Reckon some people know the results already? I certainly know one of the results that hasn't been yet... —Preceding unsigned comment added by El Xando ( talk • contribs) 21:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
I know a result because of a line of like 3 people who know one of the candidates. I live very near one of them. Admittedly, I can't prove it :P —Preceding unsigned comment added by El Xando ( talk • contribs) 17:55, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Week 6 prize was a dinner of beef with truffles not beef truffles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.41.47.169 ( talk) 00:24, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
I messed up when trying to update the table and I don't know how to revert! This wasn't anything malicious, and I would thank someone if they could revert it for me. Sorry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorsha ( talk • contribs) 20:59, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
I've semi'd this article for a fortnight due to the constant strange-IP-edit/revert/strange-IP-edit/revert cycle I can see in the history. IP editor, you can use {{ editsemiprotected}} on this page along with a justification of your edits and someone will add them. Otherwise, you're not welcome on the page for at least the next fortnight. ➲ redvers throwing my arms around Paris 11:25, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Could somebody replace the following. First, on col1 replace Left Show with Result. Next, on can-week add whether they were hired, runner up or fired before the result. Eg Anita, Fired Week 1. Finally, removed the legends on can-stat and legend examples. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.168.116 ( talk) 12:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 27 September 2018. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'm sorry to be awkward, but unless there's a reliable source available for the baby-show (because self-published sources like Flickr aren't accepted), then the information will have to stay out. ╟─ Treasury Tag► contribs─╢ 07:23, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
I've done some very rough work updating the page for week 2 and week 3. However, it was a very rough update, with little detail. Please feel free to change and improve what I've done. I'll continue work on it tomorrow if no one gets to it first. Jozal ( talk) 21:43, 1 April 2009 (UTC)
Yesterday, I included the ratings from the BARB website. However, someone has changed these to DigitalSpy, although I believe BARB to be more reliable. However, if experienced editors would like to contribute, then please do so. I feel that BARB are much more reliable and have a good validity, whereas DigitalSpy doesn't. However, I'd like to know which source to use so I can therefore proceed editing the ratings? 86.134.230.47 ( talk) 19:09, 16 April 2009 (UTC)
Not surprised that my edits yesterday were reverted, but there is no easy way to tell how often any particular candidate has been on the winning team, without looking up and down each column to see if there is a B in a square of the same colour. Any suggestions as to how this could be done while keeping the table reasonably clean? I had put an 'L' in the squares for losing team members but apparently that was too cluttered. Perhaps have a different colour for winning or losing team rather than Ignite/Empire, and a new row saying which team won? I think it is more useful to know whether a candidate won or lost than whether they were on Empire or Ignite. Anguswalker ( talk) 11:03, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
I have now changed the table's colours and added an extra row. Now the winning team is always pink and the losing team always purple. You can now tell at a glance how often any individual has won and how often each team has won when you couldn't before, and I don't think it is too cluttered. Happy to alter the previous series' tables in the same way if desired. Anguswalker ( talk) 09:40, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm not sure if anyone else is aware, but before the most recent episode at least 2 people edited the article with the correct person who was fired. Admittedly, they both could be guessing, but they would have lucky guesses and surely if they were just guesses they wouldn't have straight up edited the article... Reckon some people know the results already? I certainly know one of the results that hasn't been yet... —Preceding unsigned comment added by El Xando ( talk • contribs) 21:10, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
I know a result because of a line of like 3 people who know one of the candidates. I live very near one of them. Admittedly, I can't prove it :P —Preceding unsigned comment added by El Xando ( talk • contribs) 17:55, 24 April 2009 (UTC)
Week 6 prize was a dinner of beef with truffles not beef truffles. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.41.47.169 ( talk) 00:24, 30 April 2009 (UTC)
I messed up when trying to update the table and I don't know how to revert! This wasn't anything malicious, and I would thank someone if they could revert it for me. Sorry! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jorsha ( talk • contribs) 20:59, 6 May 2009 (UTC)
I've semi'd this article for a fortnight due to the constant strange-IP-edit/revert/strange-IP-edit/revert cycle I can see in the history. IP editor, you can use {{ editsemiprotected}} on this page along with a justification of your edits and someone will add them. Otherwise, you're not welcome on the page for at least the next fortnight. ➲ redvers throwing my arms around Paris 11:25, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
Could somebody replace the following. First, on col1 replace Left Show with Result. Next, on can-week add whether they were hired, runner up or fired before the result. Eg Anita, Fired Week 1. Finally, removed the legends on can-stat and legend examples. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.132.168.116 ( talk) 12:02, 23 May 2009 (UTC)