The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Hahc21 ( talk · contribs) 05:02, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Ok, ladies and gentlemen, let's do this. I'll be reviewing the article for the next 7 days. So, by next friday, i'll give my verdict.
First scan:
-- Hahc21 ( talk) 03:23, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Second scan:
-- Hahc21 ( talk) 03:23, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Third scan:
So the article is pretty short. Well, it's not a single but simply a song on an album, so it's long enough to cover all information found. I've read it three times by now and i think i've fixed all minor issues. I'll be checking in the references to verify that nothing is unreferenced and/or original research.
--
Hahc21 (
talk)
03:23, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Fourth scan:
Ok, maybe i separated to much paragraphs. My bad. =) Everything seems ok. I'll be checking refs and that stuff by saturday May 5.--
Hahc21 (
talk)
07:14, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Reference scan #1: Issues or commentary
Syntax and Semantic scan #1: Issues only
Reference scan #2: Issues or commentary
Ok, i've checked the article one more time to see if i missed something. As of now, i believe it is ready to the final process: evaluation against the GA criteria. I'll be doing the first verdict round by Tuesday May 8, 2012.-- Hahc21 ( talk) 04:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Additional comments:
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Hahc21 ( talk · contribs) 05:02, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
Ok, ladies and gentlemen, let's do this. I'll be reviewing the article for the next 7 days. So, by next friday, i'll give my verdict.
First scan:
-- Hahc21 ( talk) 03:23, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Second scan:
-- Hahc21 ( talk) 03:23, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Third scan:
So the article is pretty short. Well, it's not a single but simply a song on an album, so it's long enough to cover all information found. I've read it three times by now and i think i've fixed all minor issues. I'll be checking in the references to verify that nothing is unreferenced and/or original research.
--
Hahc21 (
talk)
03:23, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Fourth scan:
Ok, maybe i separated to much paragraphs. My bad. =) Everything seems ok. I'll be checking refs and that stuff by saturday May 5.--
Hahc21 (
talk)
07:14, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
Reference scan #1: Issues or commentary
Syntax and Semantic scan #1: Issues only
Reference scan #2: Issues or commentary
Ok, i've checked the article one more time to see if i missed something. As of now, i believe it is ready to the final process: evaluation against the GA criteria. I'll be doing the first verdict round by Tuesday May 8, 2012.-- Hahc21 ( talk) 04:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC)
Additional comments: