This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Bible Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Christianity Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Religious texts ( defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Religious texts, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Religious textsWikipedia:WikiProject Religious textsTemplate:WikiProject Religious textsReligious texts articles

Good work. How long did this take you? - Ret.Prof ( talk) 13:37, 8 April 2011 (UTC) reply

I did not finish. Textual variants are the area of my special interest. Leszek Jańczuk ( talk) 13:51, 8 April 2011 (UTC) reply

There are some rather legitimate concerns regarding the content, I'm afraid. I'm not sure if these textual variations are necessarily sufficiently notable enough as per WP:N for a separate article. Also, I think it would be very useful if there could be some indication as to which of these textual variations, if any, have ever been of any particular relevance for purposes of, for instance, supporting variant theology, or indicating which might be the earliest text, or other matters of some impact in biblical matters. John Carter ( talk) 15:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC) reply