This article was nominated for deletion on 7 March 2021. The result of the discussion was merge. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
On April 28, this article was nominated for deletion. The discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Redistricting warrant. The result was keep. — Xezbeth 16:35, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
I removed the following from the page:
The vote with less than two-thirds present does not break precedent, as you will see from Article III §10 of the Texas Constitution:
Thus the Senate can legally adopt a motion to arrest their own members even if two-thirds are not present. Pmadrid 20:04, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
Is there compelling reason for the article to be called Texas Ten when the article itself refers to the group as either the Texas Eleven or the Texas Eleven Minus One? — Bellhalla 04:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
The Quorum pages says they went to Oklahoma.
This article was nominated for deletion on 7 March 2021. The result of the discussion was merge. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
On April 28, this article was nominated for deletion. The discussion can be found at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Redistricting warrant. The result was keep. — Xezbeth 16:35, May 7, 2005 (UTC)
I removed the following from the page:
The vote with less than two-thirds present does not break precedent, as you will see from Article III §10 of the Texas Constitution:
Thus the Senate can legally adopt a motion to arrest their own members even if two-thirds are not present. Pmadrid 20:04, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
Is there compelling reason for the article to be called Texas Ten when the article itself refers to the group as either the Texas Eleven or the Texas Eleven Minus One? — Bellhalla 04:33, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
The Quorum pages says they went to Oklahoma.