This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

United States courts and judges This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. United States: Texas High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Texas (assessed as High-importance). Law This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

I have significantly expanded the controversy section to cover some particular cases and issues with the selection of attorneys to handle appellate appeals. I feel this information is quite relevant in that the decisions cited and the court itself have provoked national attention. The section is quite long because great pains have been taken to explain the legal reasoning on both sides of the issues and the text contained in the opinions. Mysteryquest ( talk) 03:35, 23 September 2009 (UTC) reply

this is interesting material, but should it not belong in another article? This article should simply be about the institution itself, not focusing on the controversies.