![]() | Tetrasomy X has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 7, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | Tetrasomy X ( final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 6 June 2021 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | A fact from Tetrasomy X appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 May 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Tetrasomy X.
|
Should this page be named Tetrasomy X instead of "48, XXXX" since it is more commonly referred to as the former and also, how would you actually pronounce Forty-eight comma space ex ex ex ex? 198.6.46.11 ( talk) 20:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
This has been uncited in the articles for more than two years now. This can be interpreted to argue that women are less intelligent than men. I would just fix that issue except that I'm not confident that any of the rest of this is true. On top of all that, there are only 60 tetrasomy X cases on record and fewer pentasomy X. If someone can come back with a citation, please add this back. Until then, lets leave this out. — mako ๛ 04:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
"The majority have also been reported as being longer and taller." Than what? - Uusijani ( talk) 15:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
I requested that this page be partially protected because of multiple abusive IPs changing the article with nonsense information randomly. Cocoaguy ここがいい 05:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
A picture of a child who does not have Tetrasomy X but has a cleft lip is the main picture on the tetrasomy X page? What sense does that make? Also, what is the source on the cleft lip? Original research I know, but I've been aware of and following diagnoses of Tetrasomy X for more than a decade and I have never heard of anyone having a cleft lip. Is this vandalism residue? 198.6.33.13 ( talk) 20:09, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
We should add the following sentence:
"In terms of intelligence, clinical findings suggest that IQ decreases 10 to 15 points per extra X chromosome. Consequently, the average IQ scores of tetrasomy X patients are between 70 and 80."
I have a source for that claim, is trustworthy since is from a foundation dedicated to chromosome disorders, this is the source: https://www.rarechromo.org/media/information/Chromosome_X/Tetrasomy_X%20FTNW.pdf TheGreatJack ( talk) 16:49, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: JackFromReedsburg ( talk · contribs) 03:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello I will be reviewing this article. As usual, comments will be made soon. JackFromReedsburg ( talk | contribs) 03:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
MeegsC (
talk)
20:57, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Vaticidalprophet ( talk). Self-nominated at 12:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC).
what did you people do, you didn't even settle on a hook. it should definitely be "after", rather than "instead", besides, neither the article or the hook specifies what kind of institution it was. 37.225.38.158 ( talk) 10:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
article should have 1)treatment section per [1], 2) also lede could be better-- Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 14:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
![]() | Tetrasomy X has been listed as one of the
Natural sciences good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 7, 2021. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | Tetrasomy X ( final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 6 June 2021 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
![]() | A fact from Tetrasomy X appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 11 May 2021 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically
review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Tetrasomy X.
|
Should this page be named Tetrasomy X instead of "48, XXXX" since it is more commonly referred to as the former and also, how would you actually pronounce Forty-eight comma space ex ex ex ex? 198.6.46.11 ( talk) 20:29, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
This has been uncited in the articles for more than two years now. This can be interpreted to argue that women are less intelligent than men. I would just fix that issue except that I'm not confident that any of the rest of this is true. On top of all that, there are only 60 tetrasomy X cases on record and fewer pentasomy X. If someone can come back with a citation, please add this back. Until then, lets leave this out. — mako ๛ 04:29, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
"The majority have also been reported as being longer and taller." Than what? - Uusijani ( talk) 15:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)
I requested that this page be partially protected because of multiple abusive IPs changing the article with nonsense information randomly. Cocoaguy ここがいい 05:00, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
A picture of a child who does not have Tetrasomy X but has a cleft lip is the main picture on the tetrasomy X page? What sense does that make? Also, what is the source on the cleft lip? Original research I know, but I've been aware of and following diagnoses of Tetrasomy X for more than a decade and I have never heard of anyone having a cleft lip. Is this vandalism residue? 198.6.33.13 ( talk) 20:09, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
We should add the following sentence:
"In terms of intelligence, clinical findings suggest that IQ decreases 10 to 15 points per extra X chromosome. Consequently, the average IQ scores of tetrasomy X patients are between 70 and 80."
I have a source for that claim, is trustworthy since is from a foundation dedicated to chromosome disorders, this is the source: https://www.rarechromo.org/media/information/Chromosome_X/Tetrasomy_X%20FTNW.pdf TheGreatJack ( talk) 16:49, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: JackFromReedsburg ( talk · contribs) 03:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello I will be reviewing this article. As usual, comments will be made soon. JackFromReedsburg ( talk | contribs) 03:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
---|
|
Overall: |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The result was: promoted by
MeegsC (
talk)
20:57, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Vaticidalprophet ( talk). Self-nominated at 12:29, 8 April 2021 (UTC).
what did you people do, you didn't even settle on a hook. it should definitely be "after", rather than "instead", besides, neither the article or the hook specifies what kind of institution it was. 37.225.38.158 ( talk) 10:33, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
article should have 1)treatment section per [1], 2) also lede could be better-- Ozzie10aaaa ( talk) 14:08, 31 May 2022 (UTC)