![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
timelines.ws - (Sea vs. Ocean)
– Isogolem 09:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Wetman – I reverted your removal of the sentence about the "atlantic". I wouldn't have written that if I didn't see it. I'm not saying they're wonderful sources, I'm just saying that's what they appear to do. – Isogolem 09:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
In the edit of 'Tethys Sea' here, Wetman added an edit:
"Now oil geologists depend on what was once a mere postulation."
No explanation... I've removed it on merge, but only because if it looked dangly out there all alone with no support and no links. If someone wants to give it proper treatment, that'd be nice. – Isogolem 09:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
I feel that some discussion is needed regarding why some 70% of world oil is due to the anoxic conditions of the Tethys Seaway in what has now become the Arabian and Persian Gulf area. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.0.86.129 ( talk) 20:32, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Isn't the Mediterennean Sea also a remnant of the Tethys? Nik42 05:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
The Mediterrannean is indeed a remnant of the Tethys - see Hsü et al '77 etc.
I am not totally sure. There is probably some controversy. Woodwalker 11:52, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
In the last sentence of Terminology and Subdivisions, when they say "Neither of these should be confused with the Rheic Ocean, which existed to the west of them in the Silurian era", are they referring to the Proto-Tethys oceans, or the continents of Baltica, Laurentia and Gondwana?-- Mr Fink 17:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
About Prof. Suess and plate tectonics:
What's the second clause supposed to mean? 85.8.12.78 ( talk) 19:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
The article states the Caspian was part of the ocean, whereas the Caspian Sea states the opposite. I think this needs some clarification, one way or t'other. -- J.P.Lon ( talk) 07:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
The article needs a clean up.
Paleo-Tethys Ocean,
Proto-Tethys Ocean,
Neotethys Ocean and
Paratethys Sea articles should be in harmony with (Stampfli, Gérard.
"Reconstructions paléotectoniques globales". Université de Lausanne.) and (Stampfli, G.M.; Borel, G.D. (2004). "The TRANSMED Transects in Space and Time: Constraints on the Paleotectonic Evolution of the Mediterranean Domain". The TRANSMED Atlas: the Mediterranean Region from Crust to Mantle. Springer Verlag.
ISBN
3540221816. {{
cite book}}
: External link in
(
help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl=
|chapterurl=
ignored (|chapter-url=
suggested) (
help); Unknown parameter |editors=
ignored (|editor=
suggested) (
help)CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (
link)). --
Chris.urs-o (
talk) 06:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Paleogeography of the
Tethys ocean in the
Rupelian
age (33.9-28.4 million years ago). Black lines indicate present day coastlines. [1] |
I found this map misleading and removed it from the article. To my knowledge no one every believed that the Mediterranean alone was the Tethys. -- Fama Clamosa ( talk) 14:24, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Tethys Ocean. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:14, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
timelines.ws - (Sea vs. Ocean)
– Isogolem 09:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
Wetman – I reverted your removal of the sentence about the "atlantic". I wouldn't have written that if I didn't see it. I'm not saying they're wonderful sources, I'm just saying that's what they appear to do. – Isogolem 09:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
In the edit of 'Tethys Sea' here, Wetman added an edit:
"Now oil geologists depend on what was once a mere postulation."
No explanation... I've removed it on merge, but only because if it looked dangly out there all alone with no support and no links. If someone wants to give it proper treatment, that'd be nice. – Isogolem 09:03, 16 March 2006 (UTC)
I feel that some discussion is needed regarding why some 70% of world oil is due to the anoxic conditions of the Tethys Seaway in what has now become the Arabian and Persian Gulf area. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.0.86.129 ( talk) 20:32, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Isn't the Mediterennean Sea also a remnant of the Tethys? Nik42 05:32, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
The Mediterrannean is indeed a remnant of the Tethys - see Hsü et al '77 etc.
I am not totally sure. There is probably some controversy. Woodwalker 11:52, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
In the last sentence of Terminology and Subdivisions, when they say "Neither of these should be confused with the Rheic Ocean, which existed to the west of them in the Silurian era", are they referring to the Proto-Tethys oceans, or the continents of Baltica, Laurentia and Gondwana?-- Mr Fink 17:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
About Prof. Suess and plate tectonics:
What's the second clause supposed to mean? 85.8.12.78 ( talk) 19:54, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
The article states the Caspian was part of the ocean, whereas the Caspian Sea states the opposite. I think this needs some clarification, one way or t'other. -- J.P.Lon ( talk) 07:58, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
The article needs a clean up.
Paleo-Tethys Ocean,
Proto-Tethys Ocean,
Neotethys Ocean and
Paratethys Sea articles should be in harmony with (Stampfli, Gérard.
"Reconstructions paléotectoniques globales". Université de Lausanne.) and (Stampfli, G.M.; Borel, G.D. (2004). "The TRANSMED Transects in Space and Time: Constraints on the Paleotectonic Evolution of the Mediterranean Domain". The TRANSMED Atlas: the Mediterranean Region from Crust to Mantle. Springer Verlag.
ISBN
3540221816. {{
cite book}}
: External link in
(
help); Unknown parameter |chapterurl=
|chapterurl=
ignored (|chapter-url=
suggested) (
help); Unknown parameter |editors=
ignored (|editor=
suggested) (
help)CS1 maint: ref duplicates default (
link)). --
Chris.urs-o (
talk) 06:49, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
Paleogeography of the
Tethys ocean in the
Rupelian
age (33.9-28.4 million years ago). Black lines indicate present day coastlines. [1] |
I found this map misleading and removed it from the article. To my knowledge no one every believed that the Mediterranean alone was the Tethys. -- Fama Clamosa ( talk) 14:24, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Tethys Ocean. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 20:14, 18 March 2016 (UTC)