GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jackyd101 ( talk · contribs) 17:14, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I almost passed this straight up, but then I looked it over again and I think the lede needs a little work - as it is, I don't feel that it adequately introduces the articles yet. It works on the assumption that the ship may be fictional, but doesn't really explain that assumption. Can you insert a sentence or two summarising the historical sources who mention it and a little bit on Casson's modern analysis? Once that is done I'll be happy to pass it.-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 17:14, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Note: the user who nominated this hasn't edited wikipedia in over a month, and usually in these situations I would fail the article. However, as I note above, the article is actually quite close to passing and I'm reluctant to simply fail and move on when a few tweaks are enough. In the end I simply decided to expand the lede myself, which I know is bending the rules a little, but what the hell. So, with an expanded lede, this article now passes GA. If you object, I'll see you at GAR. Best-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 10:14, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Jackyd101 ( talk · contribs) 17:14, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Hi. I almost passed this straight up, but then I looked it over again and I think the lede needs a little work - as it is, I don't feel that it adequately introduces the articles yet. It works on the assumption that the ship may be fictional, but doesn't really explain that assumption. Can you insert a sentence or two summarising the historical sources who mention it and a little bit on Casson's modern analysis? Once that is done I'll be happy to pass it.-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 17:14, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Note: the user who nominated this hasn't edited wikipedia in over a month, and usually in these situations I would fail the article. However, as I note above, the article is actually quite close to passing and I'm reluctant to simply fail and move on when a few tweaks are enough. In the end I simply decided to expand the lede myself, which I know is bending the rules a little, but what the hell. So, with an expanded lede, this article now passes GA. If you object, I'll see you at GAR. Best-- Jackyd101 ( talk) 10:14, 24 October 2017 (UTC)