This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
education and
education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Scotland and
Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Areas with ? would have parts that could be improved through a typical GA review but aren't necessarily not meeting the standard now
Discussion
Can
Ajmint or other active editor confirm that they remain interested in going through the GA process? Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 00:31, 2 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Closing as failed due to lack of interested editor response. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 20:51, 7 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Reopening nomination
Allowing anything less than seven days, when an article was waiting for over eight months to find a reviewer, is too harsh; better two weeks or more. This isn't a race, and there's no harm in extra time.
Barkeep49, I have reverted your close; if you're not interested in giving this nomination time, then I'll be happy to put the nomination back into the pool of articles awaiting a nominator. Eight months is a very long time for a nominator to wait, and circumstances change, or the review ultimately comes at a bad moment. Ajmint last edited a month ago; perhaps you could inquire at the various WikiProjects to see whether someone would be willing to take on the task of making edits to address your concerns during the review process.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 21:57, 7 May 2018 (UTC)reply
@
BlueMoonset: As indicated on you talk page I erred in closing this now. Assuming there is an editor willing to make changes I remain interested in doing the review. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 21:59, 7 May 2018 (UTC)reply
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
education and
education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a
WikiProject dedicated to coverage of
Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the
project page, or contribute to the
project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Scotland and
Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Areas with ? would have parts that could be improved through a typical GA review but aren't necessarily not meeting the standard now
Discussion
Can
Ajmint or other active editor confirm that they remain interested in going through the GA process? Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 00:31, 2 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Closing as failed due to lack of interested editor response. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 20:51, 7 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Reopening nomination
Allowing anything less than seven days, when an article was waiting for over eight months to find a reviewer, is too harsh; better two weeks or more. This isn't a race, and there's no harm in extra time.
Barkeep49, I have reverted your close; if you're not interested in giving this nomination time, then I'll be happy to put the nomination back into the pool of articles awaiting a nominator. Eight months is a very long time for a nominator to wait, and circumstances change, or the review ultimately comes at a bad moment. Ajmint last edited a month ago; perhaps you could inquire at the various WikiProjects to see whether someone would be willing to take on the task of making edits to address your concerns during the review process.
BlueMoonset (
talk) 21:57, 7 May 2018 (UTC)reply
@
BlueMoonset: As indicated on you talk page I erred in closing this now. Assuming there is an editor willing to make changes I remain interested in doing the review. Best,
Barkeep49 (
talk) 21:59, 7 May 2018 (UTC)reply