This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Tibet High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tibet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Tibet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TibetWikipedia:WikiProject TibetTemplate:WikiProject TibetTibet articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the importance scale. Buddhism Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Buddhism, an attempt to promote better coordination, content distribution, and cross-referencing between pages dealing with Buddhism. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more details on the projects.BuddhismWikipedia:WikiProject BuddhismTemplate:WikiProject BuddhismBuddhism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Books Stub‑class This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles Stub This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

"The Tibetan books Tantyua and Kantyua" says Erich von Däniken... Tengyur = Tantyua? / the same book? Böri ( talk) 09:30, 16 November 2011 (UTC) reply

Probably, but von Däniken is hardly a reliable source. Chris Fynn ( talk) 07:52, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Why does the Chinese name come first in the infobox? Surely, since this is a Tibetan language work, the Tibetan name should come first.
Chris Fynn ( talk) 05:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Fixed. (Replaced Infobox Chinese with Infobox Tibetan-Chinese)
Chris Fynn ( talk) 07:10, 10 February 2017 (UTC) reply

Have you seen this new requested move? A ri gi bod ( talk) 00:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC) reply