GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Brandt Luke Zorn ( talk · contribs) 08:05, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Overall this is very good, very nearly GA. Well-written. The only blind spot that I find is that I know the box set received some end-of-year acclaim—for instance, through Metacritic I found that it was listed in Dusted's top ten. PopMatters also ranked it. The Wire included it in their 2012 wrap-up and also likely reviewed it. There's probably some more out there.
Also, most of the reception included is from mainstream sources, but there was probably considerable coverage in specialist jazz (classical, for that matter) corners as well. All of this would be great information to include, but I think the further jazz research isn't necessary to bump this to GA. -- Brandt Luke Zorn ( talk) 08:05, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Brandt Luke Zorn ( talk · contribs) 08:05, 15 March 2013 (UTC)
Overall this is very good, very nearly GA. Well-written. The only blind spot that I find is that I know the box set received some end-of-year acclaim—for instance, through Metacritic I found that it was listed in Dusted's top ten. PopMatters also ranked it. The Wire included it in their 2012 wrap-up and also likely reviewed it. There's probably some more out there.
Also, most of the reception included is from mainstream sources, but there was probably considerable coverage in specialist jazz (classical, for that matter) corners as well. All of this would be great information to include, but I think the further jazz research isn't necessary to bump this to GA. -- Brandt Luke Zorn ( talk) 08:05, 15 March 2013 (UTC)