![]() | Ten Commandments in Catholic theology is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 26, 2009. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
||
Why is Kreeft quoted so much throughout the article? It does not even mention that he is a renowned Catholic apologist in the first place. The average reader might be wondering who he is and how he figures in the article. Devortex ( talk) 18:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
An editor keeps trying to add uncited original research about graven images. Saying the Bible says and just giving the verses doesn't count. You need to provide a secondary reliable source that says it. By policy of WP:BRD you need to take your edits to the talk page before reverting again. Two different editors have issues with your edits so you need to discuss. If you want to add "opposing" viewpoint it needs to be done using a different method. Marauder40 ( talk) 21:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, P~Richard. Points noted. I also take back my commments about the deletion of the history, which were wrong and inaccurate. However the deductions taken from the texts seem elementary. Cpsoper ( talk) 00:11, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Why the hell is there a picture of some random buff dude running through water and with the caption talking about leading a healthy lifestyle and not taking drugs or smoking? This kind of nonsensical picture choice really saps the impression the article makes, especially as a featured article. I'm not even sure the caption deserves a picture box at all. But certainly not just some beefcake. It looks like someone either put it in as a joke, or as some sort of sublimated fantasy. No good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.254.214 ( talk) 08:43, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
This statement is misleading. The Ten Commandments refers to a particular grouping of commandments, if not to a specific text. While commandments exist in Islam, and while one can find roughly corresponding commandments in Islam (and other religions) for each of the 10 Judeo-Christian commandments individually, neither the biblical text nor a corresponding grouping can be found in Islam. Zargulon ( talk) 18:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
I am somewhat confused by the status of the commandment to honour the sabbath, and I'm not sure the section makes it entirely clear. Is the Catholic teaching that the sabbath has been completely moved from Saturday to Sunday (and if so, what is the reasoning behind that, given that Sunday is generally regarded as the first day of the week not the seventh)?
Or is it more that Catholics are no longer required to observe the sabbath (i.e. Saturday), but are told instead to make Sunday the rest day. If this is the case, how does that square with the Commandment to honour the sabbath?
Some further clarification on this point would be useful I think. Thanks — Amakuru ( talk) 09:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Taken from History section:
In my opinion, choosing of the word "destiny" is not good. I intend to propose rewording such as:
Thank you, Ign christian ( talk) 03:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
In the last couple of weeks, Ign christian has made substantive changes to this article, in many cases altering or even reversing the meaning of cited passages. We need to ensure the cited sources still support these changes. Does anyone have access to the sources used in this article to verify? Otherwise, we may have to consider demotion from Featured article status at WP:FAR. -- Laser brain (talk) 15:07, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move with unanimous consensus. Jujutsuan ( talk | contribs) 11:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC) ( non-admin closure)
Catholic doctrine regarding the Ten Commandments → Ten Commandments in Catholic theology – More in line with WP:PRECISE (what does "regarding" mean??), WP:CONCISE (one less word), WP:NATURAL (no one would say "regarding"), and WP:CONSISTENCY (main topic ("Ten Commandments") within broader scope ("in Catholic theology"); a string of recent move requests have been going this way—see Talk:Dogma in the Catholic Church for a fleshed-out discussion of this. Deus vult (aliquid)! Crusadestudent ( talk) 18:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ten Commandments in Catholic theology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Pope St. John Paul the Great's teaching on adultery is good doctrine, mainstream teaching, and not merely "his own personal thoughts" and there is no basis or reason for removing this sourced, verifiable material from the article. Elizium23 ( talk) 19:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
![]() | Ten Commandments in Catholic theology is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 26, 2009. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
|
||
Why is Kreeft quoted so much throughout the article? It does not even mention that he is a renowned Catholic apologist in the first place. The average reader might be wondering who he is and how he figures in the article. Devortex ( talk) 18:00, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
An editor keeps trying to add uncited original research about graven images. Saying the Bible says and just giving the verses doesn't count. You need to provide a secondary reliable source that says it. By policy of WP:BRD you need to take your edits to the talk page before reverting again. Two different editors have issues with your edits so you need to discuss. If you want to add "opposing" viewpoint it needs to be done using a different method. Marauder40 ( talk) 21:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Thank you, P~Richard. Points noted. I also take back my commments about the deletion of the history, which were wrong and inaccurate. However the deductions taken from the texts seem elementary. Cpsoper ( talk) 00:11, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Why the hell is there a picture of some random buff dude running through water and with the caption talking about leading a healthy lifestyle and not taking drugs or smoking? This kind of nonsensical picture choice really saps the impression the article makes, especially as a featured article. I'm not even sure the caption deserves a picture box at all. But certainly not just some beefcake. It looks like someone either put it in as a joke, or as some sort of sublimated fantasy. No good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.27.254.214 ( talk) 08:43, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
This statement is misleading. The Ten Commandments refers to a particular grouping of commandments, if not to a specific text. While commandments exist in Islam, and while one can find roughly corresponding commandments in Islam (and other religions) for each of the 10 Judeo-Christian commandments individually, neither the biblical text nor a corresponding grouping can be found in Islam. Zargulon ( talk) 18:37, 23 August 2011 (UTC)
I am somewhat confused by the status of the commandment to honour the sabbath, and I'm not sure the section makes it entirely clear. Is the Catholic teaching that the sabbath has been completely moved from Saturday to Sunday (and if so, what is the reasoning behind that, given that Sunday is generally regarded as the first day of the week not the seventh)?
Or is it more that Catholics are no longer required to observe the sabbath (i.e. Saturday), but are told instead to make Sunday the rest day. If this is the case, how does that square with the Commandment to honour the sabbath?
Some further clarification on this point would be useful I think. Thanks — Amakuru ( talk) 09:04, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Taken from History section:
In my opinion, choosing of the word "destiny" is not good. I intend to propose rewording such as:
Thank you, Ign christian ( talk) 03:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
In the last couple of weeks, Ign christian has made substantive changes to this article, in many cases altering or even reversing the meaning of cited passages. We need to ensure the cited sources still support these changes. Does anyone have access to the sources used in this article to verify? Otherwise, we may have to consider demotion from Featured article status at WP:FAR. -- Laser brain (talk) 15:07, 8 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Move with unanimous consensus. Jujutsuan ( talk | contribs) 11:46, 2 June 2016 (UTC) ( non-admin closure)
Catholic doctrine regarding the Ten Commandments → Ten Commandments in Catholic theology – More in line with WP:PRECISE (what does "regarding" mean??), WP:CONCISE (one less word), WP:NATURAL (no one would say "regarding"), and WP:CONSISTENCY (main topic ("Ten Commandments") within broader scope ("in Catholic theology"); a string of recent move requests have been going this way—see Talk:Dogma in the Catholic Church for a fleshed-out discussion of this. Deus vult (aliquid)! Crusadestudent ( talk) 18:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ten Commandments in Catholic theology. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 11:03, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Pope St. John Paul the Great's teaching on adultery is good doctrine, mainstream teaching, and not merely "his own personal thoughts" and there is no basis or reason for removing this sourced, verifiable material from the article. Elizium23 ( talk) 19:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)