This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Maritime / National / Asian / Southeast Asia This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion not met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  Maritime warfare task force National militaries task force Asian military history task force Southeast Asian military history task force Ships This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles Indonesia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was well written, and well referenced. From the types and kind of errors in the diction, it was obviously written by a non-native English speaker. The original editors did a remarkably good job writing this article, but there were several places where they used English in a way no native speaker would, no matter the variety of English, e.g. plural noun ("a 5-tons crane") where the native speaker would always use the singular noun (a 5-ton crane). (In this construction "ton" is considered a "mass noun" which has no plural.) There were other similar, subtle, mistakes which I fixed. I also removed redundancies and made organizational changes to the structure of the article. Nick Beeson ( talk) 12:46, 12 June 2023 (UTC) reply