![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I see that an academic journal template has been added above. I would like to question this. What is the evidence for formal, peer-reviewed, academic material in the T & A, which is a local newspaper for the general public? -- Storye book ( talk) 14:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Re recent edits: negative or controversial statements or information respecting a living individual or existing organisation should be supported by verifiable citations. Thank you. -- Storye book ( talk) 22:43, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
I took the photograph of what I understand to be the old T & A building, in response to local elderly people who were there when T & A was in the building. They gave separate and independent information to me about this. I do not live in Bradford and have never spoken to the newspaper staff.
If you have online evidence of the T & A not ever using that building and of T & A using a different building, please give us a link to that evidence, and please identify the previous T & A building. Thank you.-- Storye book ( talk) 06:59, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
A section was added using unverified anecdotal accounts as a reference. This is unacceptable (I am uncertain if it ever was acceptable, even back in 2011). Shown in this change by Storye book.
It's been allowed to endure since then, with expansions, hence I have tagged it accordingly.-- 86.29.222.228 ( talk) 13:33, 12 December 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I see that an academic journal template has been added above. I would like to question this. What is the evidence for formal, peer-reviewed, academic material in the T & A, which is a local newspaper for the general public? -- Storye book ( talk) 14:01, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Re recent edits: negative or controversial statements or information respecting a living individual or existing organisation should be supported by verifiable citations. Thank you. -- Storye book ( talk) 22:43, 5 May 2011 (UTC)
I took the photograph of what I understand to be the old T & A building, in response to local elderly people who were there when T & A was in the building. They gave separate and independent information to me about this. I do not live in Bradford and have never spoken to the newspaper staff.
If you have online evidence of the T & A not ever using that building and of T & A using a different building, please give us a link to that evidence, and please identify the previous T & A building. Thank you.-- Storye book ( talk) 06:59, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
A section was added using unverified anecdotal accounts as a reference. This is unacceptable (I am uncertain if it ever was acceptable, even back in 2011). Shown in this change by Storye book.
It's been allowed to endure since then, with expansions, hence I have tagged it accordingly.-- 86.29.222.228 ( talk) 13:33, 12 December 2018 (UTC)