From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewing

I will undertake this review. The article appears stable, neutral and generally well written. It covers the subject adequately. The image appears in good order. There are appropriate inline cites. In some paragraphs, fats could be cited more closely, but I accept in good faith that the cites provided support the info in each para (I don't read Norwegian). I have copyedited in places for clarity. This article has no outstanding issues, so I will pas it. hamiltonstone ( talk) 10:38, 23 July 2009 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewing

I will undertake this review. The article appears stable, neutral and generally well written. It covers the subject adequately. The image appears in good order. There are appropriate inline cites. In some paragraphs, fats could be cited more closely, but I accept in good faith that the cites provided support the info in each para (I don't read Norwegian). I have copyedited in places for clarity. This article has no outstanding issues, so I will pas it. hamiltonstone ( talk) 10:38, 23 July 2009 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook