Ted the Caver was nominated as a Language and literature good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 9, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article was nominated for deletion on June 5, 2005. The result of the discussion was delete. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Title. Judasamongus ( talk) 01:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Judasamongus ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Judasamongus ( talk) 21:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
https://intellectdiscover.com/content/journals/10.1386/host.9.2.151_2 WritingAboutCreepypastas ( talk) 07:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: WritingAboutCreepypastas ( talk · contribs) 10:32, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Reviewer: LEvalyn ( talk · contribs) 05:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Hi WritingAboutCreepypastas, I'm happy to review this! At first glance it looks like an impressively thorough article for the topic, and I look forward to improving it together. For very small edits I usually prefer to make them myself, though you are of course always welcome to revert or change anything I edit. I'll note bigger suggests in the list below. (I think signing each one will make it easier for you to use the "reply" feature if you want.) ~ L 🌸 ( talk) 05:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
He cited the unsettling setting inhabited by a supernatural entity, the "obsessed narrator" who nevertheless continues to return to the danger, and an ambiguous ending implying the danger's continued existence.
In using them, "Ted the Caver" takes the horror trope of "found document" or "found footage" stories and modifies them for a digital context-- this probably shouldn't be cited to just p 79 because its kind of splicing a statement on that page with one from earlier
it could not convey the source material's psychological tension and had an ineffectual twistsomehow feels like close paraphrasing while also kind of changing the meaning of the original
[the] twist sucked a lot of the psychological tension from the plot. This review was pretty detailed with a number of interesting points.
Ted the Caver was nominated as a Language and literature good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (May 9, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article was nominated for deletion on June 5, 2005. The result of the discussion was delete. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Title. Judasamongus ( talk) 01:09, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 13 August 2023 and 8 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Judasamongus ( article contribs).
— Assignment last updated by Judasamongus ( talk) 21:08, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
https://intellectdiscover.com/content/journals/10.1386/host.9.2.151_2 WritingAboutCreepypastas ( talk) 07:43, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Nominator: WritingAboutCreepypastas ( talk · contribs) 10:32, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Reviewer: LEvalyn ( talk · contribs) 05:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
Good Article review progress box
|
Hi WritingAboutCreepypastas, I'm happy to review this! At first glance it looks like an impressively thorough article for the topic, and I look forward to improving it together. For very small edits I usually prefer to make them myself, though you are of course always welcome to revert or change anything I edit. I'll note bigger suggests in the list below. (I think signing each one will make it easier for you to use the "reply" feature if you want.) ~ L 🌸 ( talk) 05:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
He cited the unsettling setting inhabited by a supernatural entity, the "obsessed narrator" who nevertheless continues to return to the danger, and an ambiguous ending implying the danger's continued existence.
In using them, "Ted the Caver" takes the horror trope of "found document" or "found footage" stories and modifies them for a digital context-- this probably shouldn't be cited to just p 79 because its kind of splicing a statement on that page with one from earlier
it could not convey the source material's psychological tension and had an ineffectual twistsomehow feels like close paraphrasing while also kind of changing the meaning of the original
[the] twist sucked a lot of the psychological tension from the plot. This review was pretty detailed with a number of interesting points.