![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I'm insecure that there is a defined "Tc star" notion out there. I believe a star might be called Tc star for arbitrary comparison to other stars, like the notion Oxygen star, which is just a star that isn't a Carbon star. ... said: Rursus ( bork²) 08:58, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Tc (in IR) used as to discriminate betw extrinsic (low lum bins) and intrinsic S stars (higher lum AGBs)
Otherwise the topic Tc-rich star is just about notable, not more. ... said: Rursus ( bork²) 09:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
To state that the presence of this element is unambiguous proof that elements are being created is circular reasoning. It assumes that the theories surrounding the age of the universe are solid fact.
It would be more honest to say “this leads us to believe” as it is not yet unambiguous proof Ana Berean ( talk) 04:13, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
I'm insecure that there is a defined "Tc star" notion out there. I believe a star might be called Tc star for arbitrary comparison to other stars, like the notion Oxygen star, which is just a star that isn't a Carbon star. ... said: Rursus ( bork²) 08:58, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
Tc (in IR) used as to discriminate betw extrinsic (low lum bins) and intrinsic S stars (higher lum AGBs)
Otherwise the topic Tc-rich star is just about notable, not more. ... said: Rursus ( bork²) 09:17, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
To state that the presence of this element is unambiguous proof that elements are being created is circular reasoning. It assumes that the theories surrounding the age of the universe are solid fact.
It would be more honest to say “this leads us to believe” as it is not yet unambiguous proof Ana Berean ( talk) 04:13, 16 October 2018 (UTC)