This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Teat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is not self consistent. In one paragraph it says that the number ranges from 2 to 19. In the next it says that sows have up to 30. And which animal is it that has the odd number?
User:Tregoweth, why did you revert my addition of the frau image? Please don't do things like that, especially not without explanation. [[User:Sam Spade| Sam Spade Wants you to vote!]] 18:15, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Anonymous comment: I have seen this picture and I think it is suitable for
woman at the very least. Knowledge does not need to conform to taboos and cultural standards to still be knowledge, and in some cultures it is custom for such frontal nudity to be present.
Does this really deserve an article of its own, anyway? Most of the content here is more like a dictionary entry, and anything encyclopaedic I can think of that might go here would probably do better folded into Breast -- Khendon 07:12, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I agree that this article doesn't make too much sense, because anything here either is already in or should be in either breast or udder. -- Delirium 07:25, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi: Wikipedia is beginning to be peppered with photos that belong in " Playboy" etc. No moral person can accept the possible consequences of this development. Please express your views at: Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Nudity (full frontal) pictures in an encyclopedia? [1] Thank you for giving this matter your serious attention! IZAK 12:52, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This line from the article seems suspect:
The medical Latin term for teats is papilla pussy penis likey pussy.
65.83.137.34 04:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC) (Phil)
I just undid a strange line on the bottom of the page, said "titi/niple". I think someone was trying to prove the point of wikipedia being publicly editable. NeoGenPT ( talk) 19:23, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Synonyms
- Pawyilee ( talk) 10:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
This may have been merged and redirected previously but it has been edited to provide well-referenced content to readers who may want more information on this topic. Bfpage ( talk) 15:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
...finały, tits 31.182.229.99 ( talk) 22:56, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
I tried to add a screenshot of the current (4 Sep 2023) infobox for illustration purposes, but no dice. The bolded word in the infobox is "boobies" where the actual page says "teat" -- not only is "teat" the actual name of the thing the page is about, but it's also much more appropriate for a formal encyclopedic register (I don't know why or how "boobies" got there in the first place, but it seems incongruous and weird). Dazeofglory ( talk) 03:12, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Teat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is not self consistent. In one paragraph it says that the number ranges from 2 to 19. In the next it says that sows have up to 30. And which animal is it that has the odd number?
User:Tregoweth, why did you revert my addition of the frau image? Please don't do things like that, especially not without explanation. [[User:Sam Spade| Sam Spade Wants you to vote!]] 18:15, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Anonymous comment: I have seen this picture and I think it is suitable for
woman at the very least. Knowledge does not need to conform to taboos and cultural standards to still be knowledge, and in some cultures it is custom for such frontal nudity to be present.
Does this really deserve an article of its own, anyway? Most of the content here is more like a dictionary entry, and anything encyclopaedic I can think of that might go here would probably do better folded into Breast -- Khendon 07:12, 13 Dec 2004 (UTC)
I agree that this article doesn't make too much sense, because anything here either is already in or should be in either breast or udder. -- Delirium 07:25, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
Hi: Wikipedia is beginning to be peppered with photos that belong in " Playboy" etc. No moral person can accept the possible consequences of this development. Please express your views at: Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)#Nudity (full frontal) pictures in an encyclopedia? [1] Thank you for giving this matter your serious attention! IZAK 12:52, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This line from the article seems suspect:
The medical Latin term for teats is papilla pussy penis likey pussy.
65.83.137.34 04:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC) (Phil)
I just undid a strange line on the bottom of the page, said "titi/niple". I think someone was trying to prove the point of wikipedia being publicly editable. NeoGenPT ( talk) 19:23, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Synonyms
- Pawyilee ( talk) 10:10, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
This may have been merged and redirected previously but it has been edited to provide well-referenced content to readers who may want more information on this topic. Bfpage ( talk) 15:49, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
...finały, tits 31.182.229.99 ( talk) 22:56, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
I tried to add a screenshot of the current (4 Sep 2023) infobox for illustration purposes, but no dice. The bolded word in the infobox is "boobies" where the actual page says "teat" -- not only is "teat" the actual name of the thing the page is about, but it's also much more appropriate for a formal encyclopedic register (I don't know why or how "boobies" got there in the first place, but it seems incongruous and weird). Dazeofglory ( talk) 03:12, 4 September 2023 (UTC)