![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Before editing the services section, please take time to reflect on the information and links that are required.
By all means make edits to this page – it is by us all working together that Wiki can have such a wide range of useful information – but please keep to the facts and check your links. Geof Sheppard ( talk) 13:00, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
i made some edits stating that not all Paddington trains call at Westbury but most at Newbury so put via Newbury instead. Is this ok? Thanks. -- Chip123456 ( talk) 17:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Ok. Newbury and Westbury are both on the line so whatever goes there is acceptable. Thanks for the reply. A lot of them run non stop to reading anyway.-- Chip123456 ( talk) 18:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
On 20 September 2015 FGW rebranded itself as GWR. The FGW article is now called Great Western Railway (train operating company) to differentiate it from the GWR page. On 11 October 2015 I converted this article's FGW references over to GWR and ensured that all FGW links were called GWR and went to the new toc page and not the pre-1948 company. However, I am not familiar with routeboxes and I made the error of not using the full link name in the routebox as I thought it was too cumbersome. I did not realise that this would automatically function as a link to the pre-1948 company. Clearly my work needed correcting.
However, the whole edit was quickly reverted by User:Redrose64 who summarised the revert "please don't break the routebox nor link to the pre-1948 company". Unfortunately the revert has taken out all the references to the toc's new brand. Some more editing still needs to be done to replace the FGW references. I assume that the only answer is to include the full article name in the routebox, however cumbersome that might be. The rest of the edit will still need to stand to update the brand. I would be grateful if someone more skilled than myself can do this for me. Otherwise, if no-one objects, I shall attempt to do it myself. Polly Tunnel ( talk) 17:37, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Before editing the services section, please take time to reflect on the information and links that are required.
By all means make edits to this page – it is by us all working together that Wiki can have such a wide range of useful information – but please keep to the facts and check your links. Geof Sheppard ( talk) 13:00, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
i made some edits stating that not all Paddington trains call at Westbury but most at Newbury so put via Newbury instead. Is this ok? Thanks. -- Chip123456 ( talk) 17:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Ok. Newbury and Westbury are both on the line so whatever goes there is acceptable. Thanks for the reply. A lot of them run non stop to reading anyway.-- Chip123456 ( talk) 18:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
On 20 September 2015 FGW rebranded itself as GWR. The FGW article is now called Great Western Railway (train operating company) to differentiate it from the GWR page. On 11 October 2015 I converted this article's FGW references over to GWR and ensured that all FGW links were called GWR and went to the new toc page and not the pre-1948 company. However, I am not familiar with routeboxes and I made the error of not using the full link name in the routebox as I thought it was too cumbersome. I did not realise that this would automatically function as a link to the pre-1948 company. Clearly my work needed correcting.
However, the whole edit was quickly reverted by User:Redrose64 who summarised the revert "please don't break the routebox nor link to the pre-1948 company". Unfortunately the revert has taken out all the references to the toc's new brand. Some more editing still needs to be done to replace the FGW references. I assume that the only answer is to include the full article name in the routebox, however cumbersome that might be. The rest of the edit will still need to stand to update the brand. I would be grateful if someone more skilled than myself can do this for me. Otherwise, if no-one objects, I shall attempt to do it myself. Polly Tunnel ( talk) 17:37, 11 October 2015 (UTC)