![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tati Westbrook article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about
living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Hopefully this will keep things simple and avoid bureaucracy. Since this article was recently nominated for deletion, and there was only one reliable source, I have reverted this to a redirect. Wikipedia has polices for how we deal with living people. Please review WP:BLP.
I would also recommend looking at WP:NOTGOSSIP and WP:NBIO before planning to restore this. Then, if all of those can be met, consider going through WP:AFC to make sure this isn't removed again. Thanks. Grayfell ( talk) 01:03, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
I have re-tagged this for notability. While I know it could easily have more than the two sources it does now, as far as I can see all of those sources would be WP:BLP1E for the video about the other youtuber. If there are sources about something else, they should be used to support additional content. This isn't really enough to hang a BLP on, so more sources should be added to explain why this person is encyclopedically noteworthy. Thanks. Grayfell ( talk) 04:03, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because, given the breadth and depth of sources, the topic could be notable. Please note that her public exposure and ratings have drastically increased after the deletion procedure, making it not particularly relevant. -- gidonb ( talk) 22:06, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
I reverted to an earlier version because the good-faith edits in between removed content added by vandals but didn't restore content removed by vandals -- valereee ( talk) 17:12, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I put in references from Social Blade, a site which seems committed to providing ongoing subscriber numbers for youtube channels (although they need to work on their future prediction algorithms a bit).
But while the numbers are very clear today, they will eventually fade out of the 'current' status they currently hold. My problem is that there are some very clear timelines (May 10 and 17, and to a lesser extent 15) but because of the nature of this story, nobody waited that long to publish and nobody is publishing after that date. I can't find a way to fix a range and create a link on the Social Blade site (see example below). Does anyone know of a way to encapsulate the subscriber data in such a manner? Or provide a link to a reputable source who has published that full date range of numbers?
For example, if you were collecting hitting stats for Vlad Guerrero Jr.: Vladimir Guerrero Jr. Batting Gamelogs for Career Games 11 to 17
While I obviously believe the article should be speedily deleted, it should at least be as good as possible. Thanks. ogenstein ( talk) 17:15, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Ritchie333, would "According to Newsweek, she is widely considered..." work for you? It just seemed like this was a strong enough statement in the sections that would justify inclusion in the lead. -- valereee ( talk) 17:35, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
I have semi-protected the article for a week, in addition to the existing pending changes. It should keep the reverts down a bit. As ever, if any admin disagrees, just unprotect without feeling you need to ask for my permission. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:31, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
This entry has been edited a few times by users to include promotion of products. This is an encyclopaedic entry about an individual who also is an entrepreneur. This has been stated. There is no need to promote individual products from Westbrook's main business, as this is not a promotional or PR publicity page for her company. The name of the company is included as well as her earnings with verifiable sources. Product promotion and non NPOV advertising should not be included. HelloHanSolo ( talk) 21:44, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
It should be added that much of her things that she adressed were eventually proven right due to the allegations from Isaiyah and the other boys and James' 2 videos regarding the dramas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegoodguyas ( talk • contribs) 19:08, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This article was nominated for
deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tati Westbrook article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The
contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to articles about
living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, which has been
designated as a contentious topic. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page. |
![]() |
Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but
graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at
pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Hopefully this will keep things simple and avoid bureaucracy. Since this article was recently nominated for deletion, and there was only one reliable source, I have reverted this to a redirect. Wikipedia has polices for how we deal with living people. Please review WP:BLP.
I would also recommend looking at WP:NOTGOSSIP and WP:NBIO before planning to restore this. Then, if all of those can be met, consider going through WP:AFC to make sure this isn't removed again. Thanks. Grayfell ( talk) 01:03, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
I have re-tagged this for notability. While I know it could easily have more than the two sources it does now, as far as I can see all of those sources would be WP:BLP1E for the video about the other youtuber. If there are sources about something else, they should be used to support additional content. This isn't really enough to hang a BLP on, so more sources should be added to explain why this person is encyclopedically noteworthy. Thanks. Grayfell ( talk) 04:03, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
This page should not be speedily deleted because, given the breadth and depth of sources, the topic could be notable. Please note that her public exposure and ratings have drastically increased after the deletion procedure, making it not particularly relevant. -- gidonb ( talk) 22:06, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
I reverted to an earlier version because the good-faith edits in between removed content added by vandals but didn't restore content removed by vandals -- valereee ( talk) 17:12, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
I put in references from Social Blade, a site which seems committed to providing ongoing subscriber numbers for youtube channels (although they need to work on their future prediction algorithms a bit).
But while the numbers are very clear today, they will eventually fade out of the 'current' status they currently hold. My problem is that there are some very clear timelines (May 10 and 17, and to a lesser extent 15) but because of the nature of this story, nobody waited that long to publish and nobody is publishing after that date. I can't find a way to fix a range and create a link on the Social Blade site (see example below). Does anyone know of a way to encapsulate the subscriber data in such a manner? Or provide a link to a reputable source who has published that full date range of numbers?
For example, if you were collecting hitting stats for Vlad Guerrero Jr.: Vladimir Guerrero Jr. Batting Gamelogs for Career Games 11 to 17
While I obviously believe the article should be speedily deleted, it should at least be as good as possible. Thanks. ogenstein ( talk) 17:15, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Ritchie333, would "According to Newsweek, she is widely considered..." work for you? It just seemed like this was a strong enough statement in the sections that would justify inclusion in the lead. -- valereee ( talk) 17:35, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
I have semi-protected the article for a week, in addition to the existing pending changes. It should keep the reverts down a bit. As ever, if any admin disagrees, just unprotect without feeling you need to ask for my permission. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 10:31, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
This entry has been edited a few times by users to include promotion of products. This is an encyclopaedic entry about an individual who also is an entrepreneur. This has been stated. There is no need to promote individual products from Westbrook's main business, as this is not a promotional or PR publicity page for her company. The name of the company is included as well as her earnings with verifiable sources. Product promotion and non NPOV advertising should not be included. HelloHanSolo ( talk) 21:44, 4 August 2019 (UTC)
It should be added that much of her things that she adressed were eventually proven right due to the allegations from Isaiyah and the other boys and James' 2 videos regarding the dramas. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegoodguyas ( talk • contribs) 19:08, 15 February 2022 (UTC)