This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Birds Low‑importance Tasman starling is part of WikiProject Birds, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative and easy-to-use ornithological resource. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks. Please do not substitute this template.BirdsWikipedia:WikiProject BirdsTemplate:WikiProject Birdsbird articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Birds To-do: history watch purge Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Endemic birds of Papua New Guinea ( more) Cleanup : Bullfinch • Vesper sparrow • Bird flight • Bird bath ( more) Copyedit : Plushcap • Magpie duck • Saker falcon ( more) Expand : Phalarope • Nidicolous • Gouldian finch • Cathartes • Cnemophilidae • Avian malaria ( more) NPOV : Debeaking • Driven grouse shooting • Abu Dhabi Falcon Hospital ( more) Stubs : Cathartiformes • Semiplumbeous hawk • Rainbow-bearded Thornbill • Sunda scops owl ( more) Update : Coal tit • Scottish crossbill • New Caledonian lorikeet • Operation Migration ( more) Verify : Argus (bird) • Blyth's frogmouth • Nik Borrow • Pytilia • Fregata • Chestnut-headed tesia • Darter • Pallid scops owl • Starling ( more) Wikify : Ninox boobook ocellata • The Institute for Bird Populations ( more) Other : Add photos to bird articles needing photos ( search Flickr for free images). Add taxonomic authorities to genus articles. More outstanding tasks at the project's cleanup listing, Category:Birds articles needing attention, and Wikipedia:WikiProject Birds/Todo. Australia: Biota Low‑importance Tasman starling is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance). Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian What's this? at the National Library of Australia. The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance. Extinction Low‑importance This article is a part of WikiProject Extinction, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on extinction and extinct organisms. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.ExtinctionWikipedia:WikiProject ExtinctionTemplate:WikiProject ExtinctionExtinction articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

The contents of the Norfolk starling page were merged into Tasman starling on 20 March 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

The contents of the Lord Howe starling page were merged into Tasman starling on 20 March 2021. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page.

The two (extinct) subspecies share much in common, and hence best discussed in one places where their similarities and differences can be discussed. There is enough content for 1 reasonable article, but not 3. Klbrain ( talk) 15:55, 4 August 2020 (UTC) reply

If they are mere subspecies, then yes. FunkMonk ( talk) 16:01, 4 August 2020 (UTC) reply

Merge sounds reasonable. MeegsC ( talk) 22:38, 26 November 2020 (UTC) reply

Klbrain, are you planning to do this merge? There has been no dissention noted. MeegsC ( talk) 20:22, 18 March 2021 (UTC) reply

Thanks for the ping; happy to bump it up my to-do-list.   Y  Merger complete. Klbrain ( talk) 06:34, 20 March 2021 (UTC) reply