This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Sagie (
talk) suspects that this section (specifically
this version) may be a copyright violation, but without a
source this cannot be definitively determined. |
-- Sagie ( talk) 11:28, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
I think "Targeted advertising benefits consumers because advertisers are able to effectively attract the consumers" is simply not describing a benefit to the customer. Also, whether relevant ads are to be considered a benefit is highly debatable and should be described as an opinion ("Proponents of targeted advertising argue that it is a benefit.."). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.179.111.119 ( talk) 19:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Sagie (
talk) suspects that this section (specifically
this version) may be a copyright violation, but without a
source this cannot be definitively determined. |
-- Sagie ( talk) 11:28, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
I think "Targeted advertising benefits consumers because advertisers are able to effectively attract the consumers" is simply not describing a benefit to the customer. Also, whether relevant ads are to be considered a benefit is highly debatable and should be described as an opinion ("Proponents of targeted advertising argue that it is a benefit.."). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.179.111.119 ( talk) 19:33, 10 April 2017 (UTC)