 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from Farris, Paul W.; Neil T. Bendle; Phillip E. Pfeifer; David J. Reibstein (2010). Marketing Metrics: The Definitive Guide to Measuring Marketing Performance. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
ISBN
0137058292.. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the
GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by
VRT volunteers, under ticket number
2012021110008071. Permission applies only to such content from this book as is already present in the article on February 1, 2013. See item #86 in the OTRS records This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en  wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
I'm not sure where to move this section to - possibly INTAMs page? TRPs are not a solely Indian metric, so I question the relevance of it here. Pdinc ( talk) 16:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
TRP is measured through peoples meters which were fitted in some sample houses.But what about people which constitute 70 per centage of India who are watching DD programmes through antenna and DTH. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.92.67.59 ( talk) 14:30, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Re the first sentence, a target rating point is certainly not a device. Can anyone clarify? Thanks. Jessicapierce ( talk) 04:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Is it time for a new page specifically devoted to the TRP scam and investigation? I think there's sufficient information now for to warrant its own page. - Naushervan ( talk) 07:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Naushervan, Keep adding new content to this page. Eventually when the conditions are met, it will be WP:CFORK ed to a new article. Walrus Ji ( talk) 07:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| The content of this article has been derived in whole or part from Farris, Paul W.; Neil T. Bendle; Phillip E. Pfeifer; David J. Reibstein (2010). Marketing Metrics: The Definitive Guide to Measuring Marketing Performance. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education, Inc.
ISBN
0137058292.. Permission has been received from the copyright holder to release this material under both the
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license and the
GNU Free Documentation License. You may use either or both licenses. Evidence of this has been confirmed and stored by
VRT volunteers, under ticket number
2012021110008071. Permission applies only to such content from this book as is already present in the article on February 1, 2013. See item #86 in the OTRS records This template is used by approved volunteers dealing with the Wikimedia volunteer response team system (VRTS) after receipt of a clear statement of permission at permissions-en wikimedia.org. Do not use this template to claim permission. |
I'm not sure where to move this section to - possibly INTAMs page? TRPs are not a solely Indian metric, so I question the relevance of it here. Pdinc ( talk) 16:45, 15 May 2012 (UTC)
TRP is measured through peoples meters which were fitted in some sample houses.But what about people which constitute 70 per centage of India who are watching DD programmes through antenna and DTH. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 111.92.67.59 ( talk) 14:30, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
Re the first sentence, a target rating point is certainly not a device. Can anyone clarify? Thanks. Jessicapierce ( talk) 04:02, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Is it time for a new page specifically devoted to the TRP scam and investigation? I think there's sufficient information now for to warrant its own page. - Naushervan ( talk) 07:09, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
- Naushervan, Keep adding new content to this page. Eventually when the conditions are met, it will be WP:CFORK ed to a new article. Walrus Ji ( talk) 07:11, 25 January 2021 (UTC)