This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Greece Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Mythology Low‑importance This redirect is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Wikipedia. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Zeus should also be mentioned as an alternate father of Tantalus as explained in Tantalus.

ICE77 ( talk) 05:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC) reply

Our treatment of Tantalus is... a mess at the moment. Currently, we have articles on both Tantalus (son of Broteas) and Tantalus (son of Menelaus). The article on the son of Menelaus is actually about Tantalus (son of Thyestes), which is a redirect to that article. Menelaus is not mentioned in the article about his supposed son; nor indeed is a son called Tantalus mentioned at Menelaus. Both articles claim that their Tantalus was the first husband of Clytemnestra.

As I see it, there are two main possible ways of dealing with this:

1. Treat the two as separate characters with distinct genealogies, both of whom in some versions are considered to have been the husband of Clytemnestra. In this case, Tantalus (son of Menelaus) should be moved to Tantalus (son of Thyestes).
2. Treat the two as the same character whose genealogy is different in different sources. In this case, the two articles should be merged (either here, to Tantalus (son of Thyestes), or to some alternate title.

My inclination is that we should consider them the same character with alternate genealogies: DGRBM vol.3 does that ( Tantalus (2)); as does John Gilbert, " Clytemnestra's first marriage" in Pedrick and Oberhelman, The soul of tragedy : essays on Athenian drama. Timothy Gantz Early Greek Myth also (pp.549-50) treats all of the stories about Tantalus son of Thyestes and Tantalus son of Broteas together as variations of one another. Caeciliusinhorto ( talk) 20:58, 14 July 2022 (UTC) reply