![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is what you get when you plagiarize DANFS: a paean to Tang, which says not 1 word about her lousy pancake diesels, which were so bad, Ned Beach risked court-martial by going on an open circuit to complain about them (as he recounts, at ironic third hand, in Cold is the Sea). Trekphiler ( talk) 01:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
This article was moved to make way for a disambig page which was fine. However the move did not follow proper nomenclature. Just a heads up that I will move the page again with the proper name. Llammakey ( talk) 09:02, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. BilCat, please sort out the categories (they can be done speedily). Cheers, Number 5 7 19:14, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
United States Tang-class submarine → Tang-class submarine – Two-item DAB pages are generally not needed, and the other item, Type 096 submarine, doesn't even include "Tang" in its title. A hatnote can be used instead. Also, the US sub class is clearly the primary topic. BilCat ( talk) 14:21, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Type 096 submarine which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 18:01, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
The Infobox listing of Succeeding classes lists the USS Nautilus and USS Seawolf. This is incorrect, from a design viewpoint these two subs had nothing to do with the Tang-class. The Skate-class OTOH IS a succeeding class, since that class was an attempt to build a Tang with nuclear power. Tfdavisatsnetnet ( talk) 14:25, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
On 18 April 2021 a new section that described the evolution of the Skate-class from the Tang-class was removed. It has now been restored with additional supporting text and reference. It should be pointed out that the original post was a verbatim quote from the Skate-class article's introduction that dates from the creation of the article in 2004. If there is a good reason to delete this from this Tang-class article then it should also be deleted from the Skate-class article. BTW, from a high-level design perspective these statements are not incorrect. Tfdavisatsnetnet ( talk) 16:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This is what you get when you plagiarize DANFS: a paean to Tang, which says not 1 word about her lousy pancake diesels, which were so bad, Ned Beach risked court-martial by going on an open circuit to complain about them (as he recounts, at ironic third hand, in Cold is the Sea). Trekphiler ( talk) 01:36, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
This article was moved to make way for a disambig page which was fine. However the move did not follow proper nomenclature. Just a heads up that I will move the page again with the proper name. Llammakey ( talk) 09:02, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: moved. BilCat, please sort out the categories (they can be done speedily). Cheers, Number 5 7 19:14, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
United States Tang-class submarine → Tang-class submarine – Two-item DAB pages are generally not needed, and the other item, Type 096 submarine, doesn't even include "Tang" in its title. A hatnote can be used instead. Also, the US sub class is clearly the primary topic. BilCat ( talk) 14:21, 22 March 2016 (UTC)
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Type 096 submarine which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. — RMCD bot 18:01, 10 July 2018 (UTC)
The Infobox listing of Succeeding classes lists the USS Nautilus and USS Seawolf. This is incorrect, from a design viewpoint these two subs had nothing to do with the Tang-class. The Skate-class OTOH IS a succeeding class, since that class was an attempt to build a Tang with nuclear power. Tfdavisatsnetnet ( talk) 14:25, 26 September 2021 (UTC)
On 18 April 2021 a new section that described the evolution of the Skate-class from the Tang-class was removed. It has now been restored with additional supporting text and reference. It should be pointed out that the original post was a verbatim quote from the Skate-class article's introduction that dates from the creation of the article in 2004. If there is a good reason to delete this from this Tang-class article then it should also be deleted from the Skate-class article. BTW, from a high-level design perspective these statements are not incorrect. Tfdavisatsnetnet ( talk) 16:31, 26 September 2021 (UTC)