| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
The article is written in a tone that suggests an attempt to disparage the article's subject. In particular, the "Plans undeterred" section makes numerous allegations of fact which have no citations. Further, loaded words are used, e.g. "politicised USSU". Siauderman ( talk) 08:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
This whole article seems to be written by somebody who has just down a few bottles. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
202.156.140.6 (
talk)
14:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Actually this seems to be the result of the chunk of recent edits by 63.92.246.153, which made quite a number of claims without any reference given, tone/neutrality notwithstanding. I've reverted to the version prior to those edits pointed out the need for references in the edit summary. Zhanzhao ( talk) 00:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
The article is written in a tone that suggests an attempt to disparage the article's subject. In particular, the "Plans undeterred" section makes numerous allegations of fact which have no citations. Further, loaded words are used, e.g. "politicised USSU". Siauderman ( talk) 08:30, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
This whole article seems to be written by somebody who has just down a few bottles. — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
202.156.140.6 (
talk)
14:54, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
- Actually this seems to be the result of the chunk of recent edits by 63.92.246.153, which made quite a number of claims without any reference given, tone/neutrality notwithstanding. I've reverted to the version prior to those edits pointed out the need for references in the edit summary. Zhanzhao ( talk) 00:04, 30 January 2016 (UTC)