Thanks for knocking this one up, much appreciated in light of my comments elsewhere! I think there's a little bit of assumed jargon here, which we could probably resolve at GA by linking, so apologies if I'm asking for a few more phrases to be linked...
"Tungsten carbide has ..." you previously told us this was WC, why not use that?
Dislike using chemical symbols when names are available. The symbol tells you its composition, without having to check out the other article, which is why I included it.
Hawkeye7(discuss)11:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)reply
Thanks for knocking this one up, much appreciated in light of my comments elsewhere! I think there's a little bit of assumed jargon here, which we could probably resolve at GA by linking, so apologies if I'm asking for a few more phrases to be linked...
"Tungsten carbide has ..." you previously told us this was WC, why not use that?
Dislike using chemical symbols when names are available. The symbol tells you its composition, without having to check out the other article, which is why I included it.
Hawkeye7(discuss)11:54, 31 August 2021 (UTC)reply