A fact from Tamil Nadu Forest Department appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 February 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of
forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
Oppose: on the grounds that Forests is a distinct subdepartment, has a long independent history and is currently a well-referenced page covering a distinct topic. A separate page seems reasonable.
Klbrain (
talk)
18:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)reply
This recruitment committee does not appear to be sufficiently notable for a stand-alone article, but could appropriately be mentioned in the article on the Forest Department.
PamD14:09, 6 May 2015 (UTC)reply
A fact from Tamil Nadu Forest Department appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 February 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of
India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of
forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
Oppose: on the grounds that Forests is a distinct subdepartment, has a long independent history and is currently a well-referenced page covering a distinct topic. A separate page seems reasonable.
Klbrain (
talk)
18:50, 1 December 2016 (UTC)reply
This recruitment committee does not appear to be sufficiently notable for a stand-alone article, but could appropriately be mentioned in the article on the Forest Department.
PamD14:09, 6 May 2015 (UTC)reply