This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tamaraw article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Tamaraw has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Priority 1 (top)
|
tamaraw = timarau The Philipine word for this animal is timarau. There are hundreds of indigenous languages in the Philipine islands, but the term 'timarau' would probably be most recognizable.
picture? ~~
The National Animal of the Philippines is the Tamaraw. It was changed by the Philippine Congress.
1. complete ALL citations - link with DENR experts/contacts (let me know if u still need help with this!)
2. spellcheck c/o User:Chris the speller - leave a msg in his talk page
3. submit for peer review
4. comply peer review suggestions
5. nominate for GA
6. comply with GA nominee suggestions - PASS OR FAIL the nomination
7. If pass, improve for FA nomination
8. If fail, comply requirements/suggestions then renom
—The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Pinay06 (
talk •
contribs)
15:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC).
Been bulking up the article, it's around 70% ready for FAC but I sense that we will definitely need a few pictures. If anyone has any pics, please upload them or contact me so we can properly format and upload them appropriately. Thanks! Shrumster 10:05, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
This image may be a no no, since there is already a free image. But since the current one is an illustration and there are no live photos that are freely licensed, I think it might be okay to upload to Wikipedia under a fair-use rationale. VanTucky Talk 21:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
As it stands, the article is a very good start, and has a lot of interesting an useful information in it. Though I see some issues with organization, as well as some very short sections (e.g. habitat, feeding, etc), so I don't think the article meets the current Good Article criteria at the present time. Following are specific comments and issues:
Hope these suggestions help to improve the article. Additionally, it might also help to review some of the other organism articles listed under 'biology' at WP:GA, such as Elephant. The Jaguar article is also a good example as well, and is currently a featured article. Please renominate it at WP:GAC once the issues are addressed. Cheers! Dr. Cash 22:11, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
I think its time to renom this article. I think the only problem back then is the arrangement of the sections which are now resolved. To the reviewer, should the article still not pass, please hold the GA rather than fail it automatically. You can then tell me what should be done in my talk page or here.-- Lenticel ( talk) 09:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of February 21, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
I do not quite understand why the last reviewer has failed the article , but to my best understanding of the GA criteria, the article will pass, perhaps not with flying colours, but a pass nonetheless.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to
Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.—
Λua∫
Wi
se (
Operibus anteire)
16:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Tamaraw. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 06:34, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Tamaraw article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | Tamaraw has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Priority 1 (top)
|
tamaraw = timarau The Philipine word for this animal is timarau. There are hundreds of indigenous languages in the Philipine islands, but the term 'timarau' would probably be most recognizable.
picture? ~~
The National Animal of the Philippines is the Tamaraw. It was changed by the Philippine Congress.
1. complete ALL citations - link with DENR experts/contacts (let me know if u still need help with this!)
2. spellcheck c/o User:Chris the speller - leave a msg in his talk page
3. submit for peer review
4. comply peer review suggestions
5. nominate for GA
6. comply with GA nominee suggestions - PASS OR FAIL the nomination
7. If pass, improve for FA nomination
8. If fail, comply requirements/suggestions then renom
—The preceding
unsigned comment was added by
Pinay06 (
talk •
contribs)
15:21, 28 March 2007 (UTC).
Been bulking up the article, it's around 70% ready for FAC but I sense that we will definitely need a few pictures. If anyone has any pics, please upload them or contact me so we can properly format and upload them appropriately. Thanks! Shrumster 10:05, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
This image may be a no no, since there is already a free image. But since the current one is an illustration and there are no live photos that are freely licensed, I think it might be okay to upload to Wikipedia under a fair-use rationale. VanTucky Talk 21:29, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
As it stands, the article is a very good start, and has a lot of interesting an useful information in it. Though I see some issues with organization, as well as some very short sections (e.g. habitat, feeding, etc), so I don't think the article meets the current Good Article criteria at the present time. Following are specific comments and issues:
Hope these suggestions help to improve the article. Additionally, it might also help to review some of the other organism articles listed under 'biology' at WP:GA, such as Elephant. The Jaguar article is also a good example as well, and is currently a featured article. Please renominate it at WP:GAC once the issues are addressed. Cheers! Dr. Cash 22:11, 18 September 2007 (UTC)
I think its time to renom this article. I think the only problem back then is the arrangement of the sections which are now resolved. To the reviewer, should the article still not pass, please hold the GA rather than fail it automatically. You can then tell me what should be done in my talk page or here.-- Lenticel ( talk) 09:57, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
I am glad to report that this article nomination for good article status has been promoted. This is how the article, as of February 21, 2008, compares against the six good article criteria:
I do not quite understand why the last reviewer has failed the article , but to my best understanding of the GA criteria, the article will pass, perhaps not with flying colours, but a pass nonetheless.
If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to
Good article reassessment. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status, and congratulations.—
Λua∫
Wi
se (
Operibus anteire)
16:47, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Tamaraw. Please take a moment to review
my edit. You may add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 07:06, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. — Community Tech bot ( talk) 06:34, 2 April 2019 (UTC)