This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support per nom. We usually try to expand abbreviations. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 12:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose per
WP:NCA and
WP:TITLEFORMAT. The article titles policy says that Abbreviations and acronyms...should be avoided unless the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject. (emphasis mine, trimmed) The MoS says that Acronyms should be used in a page name if the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject. Given that
the section of the MoS for abbreviations says that the full name does not need to be written out in full on first use, nor provided on first use in parentheses after the full name if written out with "UK", I would oppose moving this page.
WP:CONSISTENT may also apply, to a weaker scale, with pages such as
UK garage.
🐶 EpicPupper(he/him |
talk) 03:13, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Consistency would actually be more with United Kingdom, which is used far more in article titles than UK. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 13:57, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Support. Article titles are almost always spelled out fully. There is no reason for this not to be.
Gonnym (
talk) 23:16, 14 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support per nom. We usually try to expand abbreviations. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 12:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Oppose per
WP:NCA and
WP:TITLEFORMAT. The article titles policy says that Abbreviations and acronyms...should be avoided unless the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject. (emphasis mine, trimmed) The MoS says that Acronyms should be used in a page name if the subject is known primarily by its abbreviation and that abbreviation is primarily associated with the subject. Given that
the section of the MoS for abbreviations says that the full name does not need to be written out in full on first use, nor provided on first use in parentheses after the full name if written out with "UK", I would oppose moving this page.
WP:CONSISTENT may also apply, to a weaker scale, with pages such as
UK garage.
🐶 EpicPupper(he/him |
talk) 03:13, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Consistency would actually be more with United Kingdom, which is used far more in article titles than UK. --
Necrothesp (
talk) 13:57, 13 April 2022 (UTC)reply
Support. Article titles are almost always spelled out fully. There is no reason for this not to be.
Gonnym (
talk) 23:16, 14 April 2022 (UTC)reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.